So one person at one meeting stops all negotiations, stops the rest of the club from working and stops them from being able to update supporters?

Firstly i'm neither for or against Neil Barker. He's definately not a friend of mine either. I just agree whole heartedly with his recent article which has lots of home truth's. There has been occasions where a few journalistic errors have evidently been rightly pointed out by you (Monty Python) , and you've constantly blasted Barker on here and on the MEN comments board continually,only proving you're a wilko apologist and any bad press against him nurkes you to the bone.

Wilkinson's made massive blunders at this club more damaging than NB can ever do, and you sit behind a keyboard foaming at the mouth in his defence. You're either OBSESSED or a family member , either or proves your a club apologist beach boy....

We've achieved the nickname "LAUGHING STOCK" through one person and it's not Neil Barker.

Reading that article, one must argue it would delay any decision on future sponsors and future club ownership.
The meeting, the article alleges, could lead to relegation from and promotion to a 12 team (not 14 team as at present) League. Surely we would not only need someone like Wilky at this meeting but also it would cause some reassessment by any financial input until the future became clearer.
Imagine going to buy a car, then was told that it was not sure whether the engine would be 1100 cc or 1600 cc AND also whether the repayments would be over 12 months or 24 months at the same level.

Another ???

That would suggest that I have done some previously. I must be writing them in my sleep.

That would be a neat trick, especially if you were also getting paid for them

What a top journo my mate nidge is,right to the point.Keep up the good work fella,ignore the beach boys mate,and as for monty python just tell him that Wilky is not the Messiah,he`s just a very very naughty boy.