I'm with you.

The trouble is, there's no reasoning with idiots. They can only see their own point of view. If I was feeling generous, I'd say any valid point mitie mouse thinks he has is washed away in a tsunami of blinkered stupidity and a total lack of respect for his fellow fans. There's no point in trying to be reasonable, in fact, there's no point in even carrying this thread on from my point of view.

Totally agree, even if you have the most valid point when it is put across in the infantile way MM seems to relish in you lose all sympathy for his whitterings.
Not one person could argue that JW has always made the correct choices at the club, but the most salient point is that as the chairman he is in a position where he can make those by right.
Without doubt every Salford fan owes him a debt of gratitude for his generosity in running the club and just as importantly his tollerance for the people who should appreciate it but fail to do so.

and there's me thinking it was a rhetorical question you had asked, and then you go and answer it.

Take a bow

I think you are a big fan of the apostrophe, just that you are using most of them in all the wrong places (with apologies to Eric Morecambe and Lynne Truss)

The minute you have the wilky love fest on the ropes, they retaliate with grammar faults. Its your last line of defence. Very sad

That should be "it's".

Let's start afresh here.

JW has kept the Club afloat over his tenure so far. If he'd have cut and run we would definitely not have a SL Club, and possibly no Club at all. That's not a JW love-fest, that's financial certainty. Go dig out the finances.

Give me a realistic viable alternative to JW at this moment in time and I might start listening.

Please think about it. No, Lotto winners, no imaginary foreign money-men. Genuine alternatives.

If you can't produce something viable, all the pointless sniping, name-calling, and Chinese whispers, along with personal dislikes amount to nothing.

no not on the ropes, just can actually see what is happening from a fans view not ex-employee, which is not normally a balanced one, mind you I always recommend an ex-employer of mine whom I left in 1987, even though somethings they did cost me a few thousand in commission, but I also made a few thousand as well.

Can a Mod tell me why a section of my previous post was removed? I accept the 1st say as a name was mentioned but the 2nd? Not moaning or having a dig, just curious as I'm not a regular on this and just want to play by the rules

Thanks in advance

There's debate to be found here??

bit of a mass debate if you ask me judging by the number of w@nkers commenting - first time I've been called a rent boy though , mind you before that I was accused of being female, not sure what that added to the argument?

"mass debate" "w@nkers"