Initial allocation of 600, stand holds 2200 or so

But the question? My avid friend is who has the power to enforce/not enforce the clause?

The Courts, you'd guess that the contract was legally binding.

We all with bated breath await the Castleford Perry Mason for an exact ruling.

You miss the point..Because the clause is there,doesn't mean you have to use it. Thats the choice Marwan took.

Why have the clause in the first place?

No I can see exactly why the Doc has done this, he is a world class player and any team is strengthened when he plays (and stays on the pitch) by signing him, stopping him playing against us is sound business sense.

I totally agree with what your saying. And Marwan has chosen to enforce the clause against a championship side..

"a championship side"

SO? Does it matter?
Your fellow fans seem to think it does not, the mighty Leigh will steamroller us and every other SL side.
And, even if he had signed for Bury Broncos, I'd still expect that clause to be used.

Salford stated the initial allocation was rl2000rl tickets.

I thought part of the pleasure of these forums was to take the P when the opportunity arises? Hock certainly seems to be helping to market this fixture

But is it a contract or an agreement, agreements aren’t legally binding, I could have an agreement even in writing that I’m willing to purchase your house but can back out at any point up until the contracts are signed, like wise you with me and legally there’s naff all either of us could do.

If he can get round it, I have no doubt that Hock would be the type of character to go back on his word to the club and chairman that supported him when many wouldn't and released him from his contract at his request to allow him to move on with his career.

This is all promotion from Leigh, who wants to bet that Hock will 'pick up an injury' on Thursday/Friday next week hence being unable to play? I.e technically fulfilling his agreement to Koukash.

The same club that allegedly didn't accompany him with any defence at the last disciplinary hearing

Can you blame them?

The blokes an absolute toilet.

Would have been a complete waste of time and diesel. The RFL disciplinary panel would have more compassion for a child serial killer than Mr Hock.