What exactly has he said that makes people think he knows so much about the hearing?

He certainly has tried to influence the appeal!

I'm torn on the whole situation. The sc is not fit for purpose and should be scrapped changed owner at the moment they are the rules!! I wonder if every club agreed to break the cap how the rfl would handle that, if every club announced it prior to start worse they would be able to do is deduct everybody the points so it would still be like starting on zero!!

Back to topic, gh is opposed to a good few changes to either save himself money or try and maintain the status quo of Leeds being successful by trying to old back other clubs bby not agreeing to changes that could benefit them!! But I guess mist in his position may doth same??

Not quite right Salford would be docked extra because they are call Salford!

Did Hetherington call it "blatant" because he has some inside info on what's happened???

Or did he simply call it blatant because Koukash publicly stated he was going to break the cap and then it happened.

Seems Koukash and you lot have taken 2 add 2 and come up with 5 for a rant.

Or it 'seems' that you lot need to start concentrating on your own dreadful performances and start playing better rugby. Mind your own business.

You mean like Koukash does when he rants about the whole running of RL even though he's had so many c*ck ups during his time at Salford? One owner cheating the salary cap is "business" for other guys in charge to discuss.

Meh! Dreadful by our standards. How are you quantifying it?