Well take him at saints who'd you want?

Dual reg at Barrow next season

I can only see the Doc digging his heals in over this if he feels he's been lied too. He is under no obligation to sell unless a fee he feels is worth comes in,

If Sneyd has an agenda it should be with Noble it was him that didn`t fancy him , the club has moved on , hopefully still with marc , Walsh going back to oz has emerged again so if saints come in for him , i wouldn`t mind a straight swap for walmsley .

Charlie knew as I reported this a couple of weeks ago , when I offered Marc a post at the Tower Circus , he declined .

A) Walsh (at this moment in time) isn't going home next year. It's a recurring rumour similar to what we had with Jamie Lyon.

B) walmsley signed a 5 year deal at the start of the season, Sneyd has 1 year left on his contract. I've seen a few times Salford fans suggest with cas fans you do a swap for Clark, also on a 5 year contract. Sneyd has a significantly lower value than either because of this,

Let him go but at the right price no point in having unhappy players at the club, we're in desperate need of a number 9 as tomkins is going back to wigan and nowadays you need speed round the ruck!

With the Neil Barker tweet seemingly preceeding the transfer request,the intended destination originally intended for Sneyd
cannot be established.

It probably indicates that his agent thought he could replace Green at Wigan.

Maybe his agent doesn't enjoy him being at Castleford.

Saints and Warrington may be interested.

A bit of a guts-kicker for those like Alan Hunte who have assisted in his development.

Doesn't surprise me in the slightest and we have no one too blame but ourselves. Why would he want too come back here and be played out of position when the likes of Wigan and Wire would probably play him in his preferred position regularly.

We (Hull FC) will take him and I am sure our chairman will be prepared to pay a fee for him, we put in a massive offer for Dobson (which you beat), so we have the salary cap for a halfback.

Unfortunately a think a few others (and more successful clubs) will also be in the running.

Reading the dr latest tweet I reckon he will let him leave for a fair fee which is only right that you get something for him.

I don't think anyone can deny him the right to request a fee, this should not exceed the value of his contract though.

I was pleased last week when it was announced he was coming back next year. However, if he's changed his mind and doesn't want to play for us then get shut but not for a penny less than 125k or a decent swap deal.

It's simple he's an asset and an emerging talent that's contracted to Salford Red Devils. I can't believe some of the Cas fans on twitter who believe they should get him for free because he wants a transfer.

Let's assume another scenario. Sneyd went to Cas this year but played poorly and didn't make the team. Sneyd contracted to us is told by Salford he isn't required and we won't be honouring his contract. What do you think would happen? Sneyd and his agent would take legal action against Salford. It's crazy these contracts can't only work one way to suit the players only.

That's upper rubbish. What about all the years investment and development Alan Hunte and the club put into him.

Wouldn't sniff the Wigan starting lineup.

I was using their star studded bunch as an example.