don't all clubs have to offer a fee if a player is under 24, in or out of contract?

lets be honest what a contract nowadays

just looked if the club give pemission(salford)he can talk to any 1 has long has the rfl no

mm yeh its all over the hull board they love the signing

i looked as well and couldn't see anything tbh.

Me neither I looked on both Hull boards and no mention on either.

One would assume that IF we are happy to let our talented young players leave then we must be happy to toss off all this superleague lark at the end of 2011 and turn into another Swinton/Oldham/Rochdale.

year on year, SL clubs are required to have a greater proportion of players from their own academy system in their side...

...we're not that blessed to allow one to go!

all boils down 2 money and contracts we need 2 increase revenue to get our cap up we now need the stadim more than ever if we are going 2 keep mour youngsters

IIRC the club he goes to have to pay a fee that relates to how long the player has been at Salford at Junior level.

Wigan had to pay Bradford for Pryce and Flanagan

It seems all we are is a shop window for other clubs to just come and pick and choose from our best players. We may as well just sign over the hill, stop gap players because there's obviously no point in developing young talent and taking a chance on them by giving them a start in Super League if we're not going to have any chance of keeping them once they're identified as being quality players.

turner is out of contract after this season, have you considered he may not want to stay?