Alan's done a good job in his role as head of youth development but doesn't have any coaching experiance at senior level. Personally I'd have thought Longy was the obvious choice considering his day to day involvement with the first team squad.

yeah course he has but it just baffles me to sack the coach and then promote the head of youth development who isnt proven or has any experiance for me i think they should have give vievers couple more games

It's easier to sack a coach than the whole side so Veivers removal was a very political statement of intent .
Alan Hunte is in charge day to day I guess because out of whats left of our already meager backroom staff he's been at Salford the longest and we need to get the week over and a team out on the pitch at Belle Vue on Sunday .
As for the comment off Ed Farish that Huntey will get his chance , it will be a slim Chance . but they have to say that .
Given the opportunity to bag a ' name coach' and with money burning a hole in the Dr's pocket there's a 99% chance the next guy will have a Antipodeon accent.

Have you ever thought that the Dr, Farish, and Lowe etc had probably seen enough flaws in PV'S work to justify their decision. Yeah we know AH hasn't the experience but its only an interim appointment until they get their man. Koukash has been quoted in saying " anyone not performing will be shown the door " obviously PV's wasnt performing in their eyes, AH has probably impressed the Dr to be appointed . TRUST IN KOUKASH what's happening internally now is what we've needed for decades. Great days are on the way just sit back and watch it all happen.

But it isn't a step forward. In my opinion, I'd love to see the flaws in veivers work. He's lost one game in which we probably should've won, so I think it's a bit rushed to sack him so soon.

The flaws are on the pitch all for us to see and to sign murthy for another month was a shocking decision.

Quote: TheButcher "We must be doing something right because as soon as opposing fans start getting their backs up about something unrelated to their own Club it says a lot. '" Yes some bitter soul on the BBC Sport forum is now even suggesting the Dr isn't a real doctor because he/she can't find any evidence to prove he is. Somebody then decided to post this link to prove otherwise. www.ljmu.ac.uk/GERI/80262.htm#An ... Processing

Quote: TheButcher "We must be doing something right because as soon as opposing fans start getting their backs up about something unrelated to their own Club it says a lot. '" Yes some bitter soul on the BBC Sport forum is now even suggesting the Dr isn't a real doctor because he/she can't find any evidence to prove he is. Somebody then decided to post this link to prove otherwise. www.ljmu.ac.uk/GERI/80262.htm#An ... Processing

right but he wouldnt have signed him without koukash lowe ect backing on it . and you telling me that a top coach would have got results with the team we had in our first 3 games

Didn't Ashcroft go to Warrington in 1982 and come back a couple of years later? Or was that a different Ashy?

It is not just one game is it.
One win since July tells its own sorry story.
Fridays game was like a horror show in which McRae had returned as coach.
One man rugby and running into the marker just does not work.
That appears to have been Salfords tactic for the past 4 years apart from the odd game when they appear to say fook this lets play how we want to.
It is this that would have forced the management team to act.
Entertainment, winning and bringing in the crowds is the main object here and unfortunately Veivers was not providing this.

I don't think you can discount the last 8 games of 2012 that we lost.

I think the numbers did him. Whereas before we werehttp://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41330000/jpg/_41330296_hrstkova.jpg" >

Recently it's beenhttp://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/blogs/6a00d8341bf67c53ef017ee40de833970d-800wi.jpg" >

but it was practically the same team as last year and we had chances in them games to win or was winning then the team just stopped playing thats not veivers fault then other games the team wasnt playing for anything and you could tell veivers can only pick the team its then upto them what goes on the pitch

Not true. Spine of the team is different. Players on loan. New signings. it's not practically the same team at all. PV has gone. Get over it.

It must be a sad day when his Dad loses his job.