rlNo Watson or Gleesonrl

So maybe something like :-

2 Ben Jones-Bishop/Locke/Evalds
5 Greg Johnson
18 Mason Caton-Brown
34 Oliver Gildart
1 Kevin Locke/BJB

19 Niall Evalds/Locke
14 Theo Fages

15 Darrell Griffin
25 George Griffin
16 Scott Taylor
11 Harrison Hansen
17 Jordan Walne
26 Carl Forster


22 Jay Walton
10 Lama Tasi
20 Adam Walne
32 Ryan Lannon


30 Matthew Gee
35 James Greenwood

Well done to the backroom medical staff.

How fit are Walton, Fages, The Walne Brothers, BJB and Locke though?

Just beacuse they're listed doesn't mean they're actuallt fit.

8/17 are from the youth. Hey not bad someone that doesn't produce!

If some of those players run out at hull then what a massive smokescreen this has been.

Not really.

You don't follow everything Salford, so would be forgiven for thinking that.

IH said at least four were 50/50 and if they didn't get the call, Gleeson and Watson would play.

Hull wont face a fully fit side no matter who is on the team sheet.

Can't remember a game (a four pointer no less) where there has been less pressure on a team. We've got absolutely nothing to lose. Hull should win by 40 points , MINIMUM. Radford won't be sleeping well tonight. Go get 'em boys!

Radford cant count to 40, let alone pick a side to score 40

We will never get to 40 points. Our attack is embarrassing. We can probably hold you to 2 or 3 trys (maybe just the 1 depending on your final 17) but that wouldn't guarantee us the win. If we score more than 3 I will be surprised.
This year at the KC we have been kept to 0 for 40 minutes on 4 occasions.

We will scrape a win I reckon, their is no way we will beat you easy.

Even if some of our heroic injured start, there is no guarantee that they will make it to the 80th* minute. Last week we had one interchange left as three had gone off with injuries. So you Airlie Birds could end up facing 12, 11 etc. as players are taken off for medical reasons but we do not have anyone to replace them.
Whatever, I'm proud of the lads for putting their hands up.





[size* or 95th if we use the Cas timekeeper[/size

that looks a pretty strong 19 considering the fuss that's been made?

That's more a nod in the direction of our recruitment more than the circumstances.

To us it's still a considerably weakened side, but you're right in saying what you said. Four years ago this would be our best 17.

It would be if they were fit, unfortunately BJB, Locke, Walton and Walne brothers aren't.

will they play any part in the game though? i would have thought if any player wasn't fit then then sensible thing to do would be to leave them out to get fully recovered?