Any ideas? Dr just posted on his Twitter.

It's about the salary cap charges., so if you're watching Doc.

No swearing.
No threatening to sue all and sundry.
Not everyone's your mate.

Read from a statement and don't make yourself and the club look foolish.

I always thought he was more like this guy, some of the Docs spin is up there with Tariq Aziz. And he's here waving the RFL rules book around just before he sets fire to it later.

rlrl

Judging by what's being said on Twitter I'd hope the best signing the Doc makes is a cracking QC for the hearing. Sayin there is no evidence but beseeching the RFL for a fair hearing.

I wonder if our Castleford loving immigration expert might put his hand up?

So if there isn't any evidence shown of us breaking the salary cap, how can we be charged?

So if there isn't any evidence shown of us breaking the salary cap, how can we be charged


Like I said before., it's confusing....
I can only assume that TP or Chase or one of the others will be at the hearing, and will openly admit to conspiring to break the cap..

One never been a real fan of MK , but he's gone up in my estimation for saying he's the only one with the b@lls to say about the RFL what everyone else is thinking.

So what was said?

Check out Gareth Walker’s Twitter account for commentary: https://twitter.com/garethwalker13

Check out Gareth Walker’s Twitter account for commentary: https://twitter.com/garethwalker13

"We dindu nuffin'"

You can't possibly mean the sheriff.
He might have finally done a Friar Tuck

So it's all about the white Maserati????

From what I can see in the RFL Operational Rules, there are two potential issues here.

One is whether or not there has been a salary cap breach. If this cannot be proved, then the club cannot receive the sanctions specified in this regard, including the main threat of a points deduction of up to 20 points.

The other is misconduct or bringing the game into disrepute. There is a clause in the Salary Cap Regulations document around requests for clarification. If the RFL feel that this has not been satisfied or there were obstructions made, then it appears the RFL can instigate misconduct proceedings. The sanctions here appear fine-based and the suspension of the people charged rather than the club.

rlRFL Responserl