I was in the offices today and me and an employee of the reds were told by the CEO that himself, the doc, noble and chase were in going to Leeds tonight to sign 2 players whilst using Rangi Chase as go between and entice them to the club. I heard Tim Smith name was mentioned. but he never said the other...

I heard on Twitter (yes, I know...) that Cas were having a press conference today at 1pm to announce that Chase was staying at the club.

Is that 100% were you actually there?

I like how you ask that [iafter [/igoing and posting it on the Cas board.

Do you always post sensitive information you're party to on public forums?

He's also posting it on opposition forums. He's coming across to me as a sheet stirrer.

Not a stirrer just wanted to make sure his story is true? And I've not come across in a bad way just posting info that I've seen on here. After all it's a PUBLIC forum.

I didn't mean you, RL. I was referring to ex-salfordian.

Are people really having a pop at someone for posting interesting information? Give it a rest, I would imagine it's better than the drivel the majority contribute on here.

As I mentioned on another thread, there will be no announcement from Castleford today.

You're right.

It's interesting to us. But when the same poster goes straight on the opposition fans forums it's just to wind them up. If they come on here and see it fair enough, I don't really see the merit of them trying to wind-up opposition fans who already pretty much detest us anyway.

thank you john gilbert red..... thats what he told us.... so why wouldnt it true?


butcher....just mentioned to wakefield fans..(personally i wouldnt sign hin)

It is true pal, so dont worry about it.

cas press conference is to announce that they have signed luke dorn etc, on a worrying note i believe chase has signed in aus, how true this is im not sure

People are having a pop because, assuming this guy's not a fantasist, it's a complete breach of trust.

I'm sure plenty of people on here have been party to sensitive info in recent months but we don't post it all on here.

Presumably someone has invited this person into the club offices and, if what he says is true, he has chosen to completely disregard the trust placed upon him.

There is a lot of assuming going on here isnt there. Like you assuming this information was infact sensitive, and you assuming ex-salfordian was trusted to keep it away from the public domain. How do you know he has breached and/or dis regarded anybodys trust, you wasnt party to the conversation he had. Or are you just assuming, again?

Let's get off peoples back who decide to actually share the information they're told shall we. I typically choose to keep hold of the majority of information I am told unless I am 100% certain to avoid the hassle and grief from people like you.