Robbie Burrow , is a half , a great competitor , with a similar length career,
4 citing's , one charge .
proves a half can be effective , competitive , without an' edge ' to his game .

TBH team's know Brough will react and this will disrupt momentum for your team .


the nearest I can find with a similar record is Sean O'Loughlin - 32 citings 1 charge

Why ?? O'Loughlin got a one match for a clothes line (high tackle) that would have done the WWE proud !!

He's got deseverdly banned don't disagree with that at all but for all the C charges recently that got reduced to one match bans for Warrington, Wigan and others it's certainly not out of line.

Oh your owner needs to keep his mouth shut too couldn't see Ken Davy commenting if it was the other way mindst maybe this will lead to another failed coup against the RL unless they increase Broughs ban.

Be sad for Salford if he and his money go but not perhaps for the rest of us.

Whereas I agree the good Doctor needs to be more prudent when commenting publicly, was it not your much missed Mr Anderson who called for the book to be thrown at Chase after his season-ending (sic) tackle on Ferres? Hmm. No strawman responses: I am not defending Chase.

Its the The RFL disciplinary thats annoyed me more than Brough has to be honest. They have annoyed me all season and fat Nigel says there's nothing wrong with it. They said he used his forearm, did they watch the footage. :


The RFL said on their page
The tribunal are aware the player does not have a bad previous disciplinary record and has been in the game for a number of years. Taking this into consideration this tribunal feel they can go to the lower end of the grading and impose a 2 match suspension and a £300 fine.

Did they watch his challenge on Caton Brown a few months ago?
The tackle he did on Caton Brown made him miss 12 weeks of the season and he had no case to answer... Why? Chase's tackle was bad last season on Ferres and he deserved the ban but Brough tackle was ridiculous. Marwan did suggest that there were two people on the panel from Huddersfield at the time of the hearing as well which annoys me even more

This is nothing against Huddersfield Giants, i just hate how The RFL disciplinary panel go about things.

Dr Koukash waited until the Disciplinary gave their findings until commenting - just as Hudgell has done;just as Carter has done etc.

Anderson commented straight after the game and tried/succeeded in influencing the committee.As have other coaches,at other clubs,since.

He is allowed an opinion.Just as Davy agrees with the salary cap...