Quote: DEVILS2015 "If you actually listened clearly to the podcast the guest said 'You never know he could be a Greg Inglis in our team in the future'. Not "Josh Griffin would be Greg Inglis material if played at Fullback''.'"
I don't wish to have a squabble with you pal. But Josh Griffin shouldn't be compared to Greg Inglis in any way shape or form, nevermind mentioned in the same sentence. Josh Griffin is taking his chances well with regards to scoring tries, however, intermittently his defensive reads have been shocking, he lacks the pace to even be considered a Fullback nevermind his weakness and ineffectiveness in the taking of high balls which was highlighted by Ryan on the Podcast which I thought was a self-contradictory comment. So by Ryans logic a player with Zero pace who struggles to read the game defensively, who often gets out jumped under the high ball, would or could be a Greg Inglis of the future. Greg Inglis is the total opposite of Josh Griffin. He's fast, reads the game perfectly, hardly gets out jumped and is arguably the best strike player in the world. Case closed.
