15 - Hauraki
11 - Mozz
8. - J.Griffin
7. - Taylor, Hansen, Hood, D.Griffin
6 - Chase, Tasi, Paterson, Walton, A.Walne
4 - Lee, Fages, Evalds
3 - Johnson, Dobson, Lock
2 - Forster, J.Walne, Hock
1 - G.Griffin, Gee, MCB, Godwin, Greenwood, Gildart
0 - Wood, Lannon, BJB, Sau


Total pens.
Saints - 127
Salford - 125
Hudds - 124
Cas - 110
Wigan 103
Widnes 102
Hull. 98
Rervers. 95
Leeds. 94
Wakefield 91
Catalans 89
Warrington 85

I see the knives are out especially from new posters.

JGR`s points are valid except getting into the top 8 - I feel if we see improvement again IH should stay. Dobson is here for 3 more years and will play a vital part & Rangi`s return will see us play some expansive RL.

Salford fans - a good percentage of the younger element especially are far too impatient - look back to Easter when we were 4th before all the hassle we have endured - we never heard a squeak from them then.

Stick with it and stick with IH for me.

I think the destiny of Harris will be determined by how the team perform in the promotion/relegation playoffs. I think a top 8 finish is out of reach now considering our remaining fixtures. A top 2 P/R playoff finish and he probably gets another shot, anything else and he could be out. Hopefully by the relegation split point in August we will have our halfbacks match fit & firing with fewer players serving bans or lay on the treatment tables.

I think Harris and his staff must start preparing now and doing their homework on our potential playoff opponents. I think what is absolutely vital is avoiding an 11th or 12th place finish so we get the advantage of an extra home fixture and an easier draw.

I think the focus now is ensuring SL survival, putting yet another disappointing year behind us and hopefully coming back stronger in 2016. I also believe it would be suicide to sack Harris now considering the disruption it would cause when you consider the big challenge ahead.

I'm convinced that Harri's future lies in the hands of Sheens.

The Doc obviously holds (rightly) Sheens in very high regard and will take his counsel, if Sheens were available for the head coaches role you'd say that the Doc would be remiss if he didn't appoint him.

If on the other hand Sheens saw enough in Harris to suggest he has what it takes you'd think the Doc will take the guidance offered.

Are you suggesting Harris could survive purely on Sheens advice if we got relegated? It's usually disillusioned supporters voting with their feet that influences an owner to make a change.

Not relegated but now, we are obviously struggling and I'd be shocked if the Doc hasn't been in contact with Sheens on a regular basis since he was over here.