Sponsors website states Manchester as their location

www.thereddevils.net/news/2015-h ... -tomorrow/ Bit of an increase in price, being a season ticket holder don't you get a 10/20% off all products? Does for the first time I've seen mentioned the magical £1,000,000 figure in that blub, that must be shifting on hell of a lot of kit.

www.thereddevils.net/news/2015-h ... -tomorrow/ Bit of an increase in price, being a season ticket holder don't you get a 10/20% off all products? Does for the first time I've seen mentioned the magical £1,000,000 figure in that blub, that must be shifting on hell of a lot of kit.

Can anyone translate?

Sorry the joys of messaging from my phone while in a rush.

Simply the article mentions that there is a change the deal could be worth up too £1,000,000 but you'd think that making that much would mean we need too shift one hell of a lot of merchandise/kit.

For what its worth (not much I know) but my opinion on the kit designs, I can't stand the home version but I'll accept the change strip as it really doesn't matter to me what colour it is but the home one, and I'll keep banging on about it, is the lack of white, is a basic Red & White kit [ithat[/i hard to come up with?

Oh on the Manchester thing, not to fussed about what the sponsor decides where its location is (although!) but I'm firmly in the camp that the club should have some recognition of where its from and who its representing on the shirt.

As I say only my opinion.

That's pretty much identical to my own thoughts. Under Armour do make some outstanding rugby shirts (google the Wales RU and Clermont Auvergne RU shirts to get an idea) but, for whatever reason, we've spurned the opportunity to go for a classy design that just might've appealed to those who aren't already diehards and instead come up with something that's remiscent of something from the bad old days of the early 90s.

The kit was actually the first item discussed at the first (and so far only) meeting of the 'fans board.' FWIW, the design was rejected overwhelmingly by those present (although some people were more enthusiastic about the away design (I wasn't amongst them!). The overwhelming majority actually expressed a preference to a design that was much more 'traditional' (red shirt, white trim) and IMO far superior.

Unfortunately, it seems that the design by this stage had already been signed off. You can imagine the surprise of those who were present at the meeting when the design they'd 'rejected' was launched last Tuesday.

I personally won't buy the shirt as I really don't like the design or the collar (it actually looks far too similar to last year's IMO) but hopefully many other people will do.

My New Kits arrived today complete with player signatures, i actually think they look a lot better in the flesh than they do in the designs and delivered before Christmas

not United because they've never sold any merchandise with red devils on it?

Quote Mike87="Mike87"not United because they've never sold any merchandise with red devils on it?'" store.manutd.com/stores/manutd/p ... 9&cid=3965 How are you wrong about [ieverything[/i?

Quote Mike87="Mike87"not United because they've never sold any merchandise with red devils on it?'" store.manutd.com/stores/manutd/p ... 9&cid=3965 How are you wrong about [ieverything[/i?

seriously are you counting a Christmas tshirt?? It probably took you about 10 minutes to find that, all my man u gear (training tops) (tracksuits) (playing shirts) (hats) none have Red Devils on, it's a nickname the don't often use just like us when we were Salford City reds. If we market the RED DEVILS enough then it'll stick and we can use the name to our advantage.

I agree on this one. Bit pointless pointing out a rare one-off as an example to discredit your argument. A fairer way of doing it would have been to highlight it, but express that it was an exception rather than the norm. However, one-upmanship is strong on forums, so I wouldn't expect a great deal more.