Not seen it since the game but it was the most blatant double movement ever seen.

the evalds incident is a tough call as it looks as ratchford is attempting to get the ball, so for me that was a try, the one from sau was a double movement, but the first 2 were defo out of touch and hill was offside to pick the ball up, but like i said it was hard for an official to see both as i dint see it till the program last night and i made sure this morning

I agree.
I'd watched Childs in his previous televised game and his quality was similar in Sundays game.
Sure, lets talk about the teams but Childs is an exceptionally poor referee. I mean really poor.
It's not particularly his game management,he just makes too many individual errors.
To put him in perspective,he makes Bentham and Thaler look good.
That's damning !

I think all referees in sport have a very rigid approach when their vision is obstructed, if in doubt give the decision to the team with a higher standing. I'm not having a pop at refs I think it's just a natural responce for them with less damaging repercussions, the last thing they want is to make a wrong decision that could lead to an upset result and a complaint. If you want a perfect example of a team that now get decisions they never used to get a few years back, look no further than Manchester City.

Over the years I've witnessed it work in Salford's favour on those occasions we dropped down a division.

Most of us cheered when Ormsby was in the corner because we thought he was in touch - thought maybe with it being so far away that I could be wrong.

The first thing I thought when Hill picked up the ball was that it had come off a Warrington player and that he was offside, was half in hope rather than being completely convinced by it. Either way, the ball would have gone to them after the knock on.

Didn't think there was much wrong with the grounding for their last try on the day.

The officials get decisions incorrect despite them adding to their numbers with in-goal judges and video referees.

They should save money,go back to the 'old' system and we just accept that as they are human they get it wrong once or twice.

It doesn't seem like they will ever get it perfect and some are of the opinion that spectators are staying away from attending because of the inconsistency of officiating.

The result is never altered whether or not an error is later established.