Quote: Uncle Rico "Seeing as you claim that you don't know what Peel and Kennedy are upto your statement is quite inflamatory.
As far as Peel are concerned weren't they trying to help your previous regime to a new ground, one they (you) couldn't afford to develop or even it would seem pay rent? Admittedly, this gesture was probably borne out of self interest, currying favour with the City Council, a bit of planning gain?
With regards to Kennedy I don't know the facts, but, aren't the ownership issues of Edgeley Park and your shared stadium completely different? Didn't Stockport County effectively become tenants in their own home (probably not nice)? Whereas you are both tenants and due to the parlous state of your club pre Koukash you have been forced onto the back foot.
Sale have excercised their legal rights nothing more and can they be blamed for that? You would have done the same if you had the wherewithall at the time of negotiating the deal?'"
I would urge any Salford to look at the history of Stockport and what Brendan Elwood (ex Stockport Chairman) says happened. He basically claims he was lied to when he handed the club over to Kennedy. Once Sale owned the club Stockport suddenly found they were not allowed into the ground anymore apart from match days.
Regarding Peel its worth pointing out they blocked the Stadium bid by Salford in favour of their own bid it was only when a comprise with Salford Council was reached they allowed the stadium to go through.
But you can find commonalities here both clubs long serving previous chairmen found themselves in deep water after unexpected financials crisis desperate to save their clubs.
Only to find a white knight comes along and down the round both clubs end up with no ground and a lease that only a crack addict would sign up to.
I have not even mentioned the blue seats. That went in a very forward thinking plan that saw them installed before even the idea of Sale moving in to the ground came about.