Harsh to blame Gaskell, as had previously been mentioned Leeds broke the line regularly so where's the blame on those missing the initial tackle? He isn't a full back either, never has been and never will be. Again though not his fault.

Theo MOM all day. He's nothing lie Deacon either, far more dangerous.

Gaskell is our only strike player at present , he's in the team on merit.
I would Sneyd or Evalds at fullback, and Play Gaskell at 6 . He is no fullback.
McGoldrick running out of the line was responsible for Leeds 1st score. Leeds with burrow Hardaker, Watkins and Jones Bishop had enough class to break SL defences and there were others missing one on one tackles other than Gaskell.
Fages was easily the best Reds player on the pitch last night. The number of times opposition defences target him shows that.

Think you can add Sutcliffe to that list as well. He looked a really classy and confident runner setting up Leeds' first try.

One on ones with Burrow, Hardaker were always going to show Gaskell in a poor light .

Don't know where Gaskell's career is going. The difference between his attack and defence is unbelievable.

i think the attitude and the style at which gaskell played is what botherd me more in his attempt to tackle the player who broke the line , turning his back to a on running player was amateurish, running at burrow in a curve motion rather than standing his ground and moving left and diving at him would of shown the effort and also he has let players just run past him with no attempt at tackling them. i guess this is why he is at full back i would love to see him in the halfs just to see what he is able to do as attacking he can do some good things

If Gaskell upped his defensive game he'd be one of the best. Great attacker, but poor in defense.