Quote: mitie mouse "Dream on.Who the hell is going to take this club on.Put it this way,Eccles r.f.l is a better option.The people of Salford are paying for this f//k up, not Mr Salford and his daughter.What gets my goat is why would you as a father invite your siblings into a business that is losing money hand over fist?I would`nt ,would you?'"
Surprisingly my post would appear to have aggravated you in some way to prompt your reaction, why? All I’m doing is looking at the big picture and stating that it wouldn’t be in the SMC’s best financial interests in the long-term if the club went and subsequently lost the license.
Putting your personal issues aside surely you can see the point I am making?
Quote: mitie mouse "Wilkys trying to pull a fast one with the £250.000 at the end of the day it's mr salfords debt he should be pay up. It's so obvious he hasn't got the clubs best interest at heart otherwise he'd just sell up rapid so the new owners could get on with the show and put the fans out of their misery.
'"
Directors would suggest to me more than one person. Generally in business when a company acquires another company they take on any existing loans and other liabilities. It appears they want control of the club for free with the current owners already agreeing to write off a small fortune in loan shares. In addition to this they now want them to personally takeover an existing club loan and repay it without the clubs income to do so.
It’s kind of like giving your car away because you can’t afford the running costs and then the person you are giving it to demanding two new tyres and tank full of juice.
