Quote: Philyourboots "Good questions
b) Definately YES. The move has unfortunately been more damaging than good from my own experiences. The relocation hasn't been thought out thoroughly enough as we've all found out this season. The site location should of stayed in Salford. I don't want to argue about city boundaries etc but Warrington, st Helen's, Wigan, and widnes's stadiums are within minutes from their centres where as ours, is a good 15 - 30 minutes drive away nevermind walk. So any advice for clubs building a new stadium keep it close to your town/city centre don't build it out in the sticks like we did...'"
I actually agree with some of the stuff you have put on here (wigan is quite a walk from the centre) the difference between us and the others was the availability of city centre brownfield sites, I had long thought that the Ladywell site would have been ideal for Salford's new ground, it has all the transport links and pubs nearby, but at the time it became available the council were not so SCR friendly and allowed a developer to build first West One and then after that office blocks and warehouses and now apartments all bringing in more in tax to the council than SCR would. Also I don't think we would have got the land on a peppercorn rent the government insists on market value for land sales and it was NHS land afterall. Barton will only get better if the new road is built (a given with Port Salford on its way) facilities around the ground and a low level bridge over the canal from the trafford side, without this infastructure Barton will struggle, with them Barton could grow and proper investment on the park could also increase crowds but we await what this new investment is and the work to be completed.