Fact .2000 +people added onto the attendance last night and it's been the same all season. Then, a few days later it's then subtracted to the correct figure. Well it would be silly and unprofessional to pay the tax on these inflated attendances hence the correct figure a few days later. These falsely inflated attendancies are a mocked to mislead folk that Salford are achieving more attendances when really they simply AREN'T.

This hierarchy have their fingers in all types of pies

The 5234 attendance was from the Daily Mail.

A 3615 attendance was up 4.5% from last season.

We lose again,It seem's like some players are going through the motions,and your on about 4.5%.

Lance for your information a question was asked as to where the 5234 gate came from and I answered it, I am not "going on about 4.5%" just giving an answer to a poster.

Which poster "goes on" about Steve Simms? Please remind us.

Thanks for taking the time to reply,John.
Sec 7 para 5 page 17 covers it.'If the continuance of play endangers an injured player....'

Not quite to do with the topic,but covering finance,has the collapse of the Elonex deal impacted on the club ?
I was reminded of it last week when 3 clubs agreed to new deals with Elonex but SCR was not mentioned,which was slightly worrying as they do the back/shoulders shirt sponsorship.
It was a couple of months ago when it seemed the RFL and Elonex had ended their deal.
rlStoryrl
rlQuotes from Elonexrl