That's clearly wrong as it makes Stadium naming rights and sponsorship a far more attractive proposition, and in turn increases the potential revenue to be gained.

If only. Salford CC lent the money to Peel for the build. I think it was a land ownership issue (the land where the retail will stand?) that got Peel to the table. I'm still wondering where the rest of the £22 million SCC->Peel loan went when when you consider that the stadium construction tender was £15M and Peel got £4M from the NWDA for ground remediation. Are we saying that the bridge, access road and car park were £7M?

Think the telling time will come when Wilky sells the club, hopefully whoever buys it will look at the runningsnd organisation of the club and make changes accordingly. If Tarry and to a lesser degre Simms are kept on we would have to assume that they are considered to be good at their jobs and thus seen as assets to the club.

As someone who has worked closely with Stockport County I have commented on this board before about how I feel about Kennedy.

He's a killer businessman and he only wants the best for Sale Sharks and his own pocket.

This rumour seems so so close to what Stockport County had to go through when Sale 'helped' them.

I really hope i'm wrong.

Could someone explain why the people of Salford should attend our games when most have little interest in Rugby League? It's not apathy but choosing one leisure activity over another.

I am a fanatic Salfordian but that does not make me typical.

We are punching obove our weight: let's hope it continues