Is it me or is a pattern emerging? Being those that attack the club require serious lesson's in grammar & punctuation ?
Quote:
Early Bath "Quote: Early Bath "So that makes him best coach in super league does it. The club again come out with same tripe every year we have best coaching set up in the league if so why don't we win out club talks crap'"
Quote: Early Bath "The do gooders is insulting to me because they are the naive put up and shut up brigade who think JW is above critisism, whom chant his name as though hes the saviour.But truth be known he is the cause of this sinking ship.Nevermind giving this board support they/he has had 30 years to sort this pile of 5hite out we only want to be competative ffs.'"
'"
Anyway, besides being mentally exhausted from reading that mush, can the people on here show me the proof and fact's they have to back up there claims he's a "yes man" ?
Are they comparing him to MP, in the sense that just because Phil didn't come out and announce all the problems the club has he's a yes man? Have you ever thought Phil isn't blind and had idea's of changing thing's regardless, which didn't nescessarily require coming out and publically slamming the club?
I think it say's allot about PV to actually want the head coaching role considering he knew what MP didn't. Phil isn't stupid, and know's it would be coaching suicide if he was to become another yes man. Instead it appears he want's to make genuine changes, and the team seemed to respond to well to his approach last season.
As previously said, I genuinely believe MP came out an announced his finding's because he wanted to give himself a way out. PV on the other hand seem's to just want to get on with job in hand.
Give the man time people, and let's move forward from there.
