I thought the ref did ok last night. He's been rightly pilloried by fans for a good while but he got the majority of the calls right last night. A few did go our way (like the break they made in 1st half which came off Grix's knees, Patten knocked on but we got the scrum).

As for the Kevin Brown incident, yeah the linesman was at fault, the ref is unable to see everthing and if the linesman is going to come on, he should always raise his flag. Also Gleeson gave him a good smack in the tackle which caused the issue but of course there is no place for retaliation.

Stood right in line with the Cashmere incident. A definite knock-on.

I was stood in the middle of the shed and could see it was a knock on. Right call.

Not a bad game Mr Childs, thought linesmen came on/were consulted quite a few times (ok not the brown punch) which is something id like to see more of.

Must have better eyesight than me because I stand in the middle and couldn't see a thing Was kind of hoping we'd get some sort of benefit of the doubt call but according to quite a few it was definitely a knock on.

Re Childs, I thought he did alright. There was a little bit of the usual refereeing inconsistency that you see in every game with one team being punished for an offence and then the other team doing the exact same thing and getting away with it, but there wasn't anything massive that he missed that I can think of.

The touch judge who came onto the pitch and then backed off though

Child impressed me as he went frequently to the touch judges and in-goal judges.

The touch judge retreated once he saw it was handbags .. and the game had moved on. Don't imagine Child had missed the intrusion ... he decided not to ask as the incident was over and the game had moved on. Why stop for a "on report" that would have been meaningless?

He's called Child, not Childs.