rlhttps://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/rugby_league/s/1127218_myler_should_he_play_or_notrl

Sorry mate I can't agree, there is a massive difference between Coley and Myler.

Andy Coley made it clear he didn't want to be here by not doing what he should on the field, he had his head turned (Like Myler) but not by his agent and bear in mind Coley was nearly 30 therefore more than capable of making his own decisions .

He came back from his (Minor) GB stint and made demands of the club (which I doubt Watkins would have been granted) knowing they couldn't do/pay it and his performances during the 2007 season , besides the home game against Wigan, he was woeful for one reason, not lack of ability, lack of effort. Take away the past two game (when he's coming back from injury) when as Myler not played to his potential?


Spot on

myler is out of form, the reason he is out of form is because he hasnt been able to concentrate on his game because his agent, the england and warrington coach as well as the rl media have unsettled him.

Coley wasnt interested in little salford after his brief and only display at international level.

Mcrae wants to play his strongest 17, which is fair enough but does anyone think its a bit short sighted? With no relegation and the playoffs out of reach surley a little experiment to see if rachford and smith can play together could save us a fortune.

Playing myler of the bench in the robbie paul role makes more sence until he finds form again and we'll discuss it then after another chat about his future.

For Christ sake don't play Ratchford, we don't want him getting his head turned by the England coach as well do we

Wakefield could be more likely.

any true professional would be able to play in this situation