No he doesn’t . First of all it’s not her fella. And secondly he threatens to put the young girl “ on the concrete”.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport ... 7853a4ec56

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport ... 7853a4ec56

A police man walks past in the background at the end of the video, surely if the staff were feeling that threatened surely they'd have called him over?

Not quite sure what I've done to make it something it isn't ? I simply asked if the poster thought it was ok to abuse Women, to which the poster added he wouldn't be overly bothered if it was members of his female family, I'm a little shocked I must admit.

I have no interest in it being Albert Kelly the rugby player just the fact that a man is seen abusing a female. TBH he could have been most places in the UK and nobody would have know him from Adam.

Just for clarity I'm sure there are mitigating circumstances like why an employee is filming him I don't know but I'm not ok with blokes abusing women and I'm glad to see your not also.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... orker.html Surely Hull FC have to act .

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... orker.html Surely Hull FC have to act .

Don’t think think thats a copper, it’s a security guard, and mcds do employ them at the town centre one on certain nights I believe.

Bulls***

It's hard to understand alot of what he says. But he says something like "I don't care who she is but she needs to tell her bloke before I throw her bloke on the concrete."

Just out of interest what would you like them to do?

Float her boat?

Who tf wrote that?

All I can say is... what a lad man.

We could send him back to Rovers. Although that might breach some cruel and unusual punishment laws.

I don't think anyone has anything but condemnation for Kelly's actions.

Stating "the wife / daughter" scenario is making it something its not. As mentioned, it didnt seem to bother the lad shaking salt on his chips.

Its does appear to be a thing of obsession though. For Example, The Reason has deemed it reasonable to plagiarise others posts, post links to newspapers and even post up an article from when Martin Gleeson was banned for a drug related issue in 2011. Now thats a strange reaction!

This is exactly why the NRL introduced an integrity unit.
What the video shows is a player calling a woman a slut, a whore and making threats to assault her.
Of course, supporters of the club the player represents immediately look for other angles, the most ridiculous one being that it shouldn’t have been filmed.
I’m afraid there is one person responsible and accountable for his behaviour and that is Albert Kelly. If he doesn’t do it, it doesn’t get filmed. It’s really that simple. Next, we’ll be claiming we shouldn’t put people in prison because they have been filmed committing a crime on CCTV. He’s a professional sportsman, in public, making an absolute tool of himself. Of course someone’s going to film him. It’s hardly an invasion of his privacy, is it? Perhaps if he wasn’t behaving in such a foul and abusive manner, whoever has decided to film him wouldn’t have done so.
I’m afraid he only has himself to blame. Going around calling women sluts, whores and threatening to assault them

I'm not making it something it's not " I have no interest in Kelly the rugby player" I was simply asking the person a question would he like the same done to his close ones he answered he wasn't overly bothered so whilst I'm astounded with his response, thats where it ends with him and me we think very differently.

As for the lad shaking salt on his chips maybe he thinks abusing women is ok too ? or is equally as vexed as Kelly and has no idea whats going on.

This, though you'll find that most supporters on the Hull forum are far from looking for other angles. Plenty, including myself have said he should be cut loose. There really isn't an excuse for it. Whether the woman in the video made comments before the filming starts or not, you just don't say stuff like that. I despair for some people sometimes.