I think, if they'd put the people in the middle tier into the top tier it wouldn't have filled all the gaps in the top tier. That's why I would've guessed at 62k max. Just my opinion mind, I don't obsess about attendances like some on here!!!

I was of course referring to when it was reduced capacity which was in relation to the post above mine that clearly was talking about the 75.5k Average for the period hence it not looking as empty compared to 80k in a 90k stadium that is completely open to the cameras...do keep up!
I know all about the previous capacity but as that wasn't what we were talking about at that juncture it was obvious to all except the faux anger to wade in without reading the thread types like yourself.

The seats are spread over three tiers: lower 34,303, middle 16,532 and upper 39,165

80,140 minus 16,532 would give you a minimum of 63,608 if zero people bothered turning up in the middle tier.. But the CW seats had more people in them than I was expecting. So for example even if CW was 70% empty, then add the 2000 in hospitality boxes and you'd have 70K.

You cannot blame the Hull KR loss on one player alone, but it is also true that Kieran Dixon's gifting of tries and possession to Leeds made the game more one sided than it should have been.

wont be long before Blake will have them all included on season tickets and be claiming increased attendances

According to the Yorkshire post we took 17000.

This video helps give a good estimate of the numbershttps://youtu.be/ewta3gI6bBorl