Yes that's what I was thinking. with a gum shield in if he did bite down, the front of the ear would possibly look like what the picture shows, a small straight cut, to really show one way or the other we'd need some photos of the back of his ear.

LOL at all the clowns on here who are suddenly forensic odontologists. And not only that, but make judgements on a couple of photos on the interweb. Classic.

I think that if Graham did bite his ear then he'll say so in the hearing

I'll have you know I went to the Quincy Primary School. I later attended the Grissom Last Vegas High School and later attended the University of CSI NY.
I feel I am eminently qualified to comment on this case and am expecting a call as expert witness from the Aussie RL.

Only if you play for Leeds

10-12 Match ban for Slater, deliberate use of the ear (had he actually joked Graham it could have been much longer).

Bollox eh!!!

Having read what was said, yes. Concoted claptrap. Kite says he bit him then turned his head. There is no visual evidence to support Graham's teeth have come into contact with Slater's ear, the damage to Slater's ear was no evidence of a bite either. It's complete and utter bull$hit, he was guilty before the disciplinary sat so you and the other sheeples believe what you want to beleive but Graham has being stitched up.

All appears to be a pre judged agenda and pommie bashing, whats alarming is the amount of executioners on here from the UK. Good job it wasn't Tomkins this board would have organised a lynch mob by now.

Yeah it was all a big conspiracy to prevent England from beating France and Wales....

FMD there have been some ridiculous comments on this topic, but some people are still striving to go even further.