So why so keen to make excuses for when another country loses, but when it's England everyone wants to revel in misery?



Was he actually coaching full time, or did he have other responsibilities that have now been filled by others?
I have already said why I don't feel the role is a full time one.

I think it is a full time job yes. How is it the world champions, without essentially a major league in their own country to develop (as they mostly use the NRL and Super League) can operate a full time coach yet here in the UK the RFL don't beleive it to be a worth while investment? If it's as part time as you make out with the leagues we have running and the size of our organisation in the UK, Stephen Kearney must be bored out of his t@ts.

ATEOTD we are not Australia and everything is not running tickety-boo

You cannot tell me that a Full time national head coach could not use his time wisely by going round each UK club, not just Superleague, meeting players, watching training sessions, advising head coaches, bringing together train on squads and trying to help youth development to it's full potential in this country.

OK this might not simply fall under the job description of just a head coach but surely this would be a worthwhile investment (and not a million miles away from what Smith was doing in the first place, it appears he just simply wanted to get back in to a head coaches job). I'm not saying it would be glamerous but do feel it is partly (a big part as well) to do with why our international teams fail so badly when it comes to the big stage.

At least they would be involved on a full time basis, what would be wrong with taking the elite players into train on squads throughout the year once a fortnight maybe, teams don't do set play training 5 days a week they have weight sessions/cardio or day's off, surely theres a way to take these elite players out with the agreement of the clubs for the good of the national game without affecting the domestic one to much?

I appreciate it may not be ideal and may not work but just feel there has to be a better way to maximise international player development within the current structure of Super League and National Leagues?

As far as the Coach goes, well at this point I get stuck becuase I can't think of anyone but IMO you'd need perhaps a decorated quality coach who is looking to slow down a bit, doesn't want the day in day out of a club head coach but is looking to stay heavily involved in the game (a Bobby Robson of 10 years back if you like). One thing people will never agree on is who that should be, there has to be someone good enough out there after 150 years, isn't there?

I'm not keen to revel in the misery and I was please with the 2007 series win but you cannot say it was against the same New Zealand that was at the world cup.

I am as keen as many other British fan's in seeing our National teams be the best in the world but when you don't agree with the current setup unfortunately it maybe reads as though we a reveling




As a national coach it would be impossible to coach full time however as I have mentioned in my last post IMO the role of head national coach in rugby league must be a lot broader than just coaching. I still don't believe that it can be a forward step by making the head coach part time. It would be like having a full time sales guy with a part time sales manager, where's the motivation coming from?

tbh i thought david waite was doing a good job back in the day

You have had a great season but what have you won....You need to look at internationals as one off cup matches where a team is picked to peak.And winning the cup shows he has the ability to pick such teams.

Course not. Every team changes every year. Teams that lose tend to change more than teams that win.



There are plenty on this thread who have clearly dismissed the 2007 success. We have seen Smith described as a failure - despite 2007 being a complete demolition of the team that later became World Champs.
We have seen a team that was completely smashed by England come back to win the World Cup just a year later.

Harrison is a cracking player and Bridge is one of the best british centres when fit.

Don't see the problem.

he was doing the off field stuff well, just a shame he was a rubbish coach. he was of the "pick the best 13 players regardless of position and fit them in somewhere" coaching school, which resulted in us having 5 loose forwards playing at a time.

You know what the funny thing is?



There is one guy who is a specialist at bringing together a representative side, simplifying their game, giving them a few things to break down the opposition with and giving them all the self belief in the world.


Problem is, he couldn't be stuffed to go back down the levels to coach your park footballers.

I thought Kearney lessened his capacity at mebourne when he took the Kiwi role and McGuire stepped up to assistant coach?

Kearney is an assistant coach at Melbourne and can be seen sat next to Bellamy at all their games, so he certainly doesn't concentrate solely on the Kiwis as was suggested.

Kearney is an assistant coach at Melbourne and can be seen sat next to Bellamy at all their games, so he certainly doesn't concentrate solely on the Kiwis as was suggested. Ditto Sheens for Aus.

Which is exactly most peoples point, whilst New Zealand have moved forward we appear to be moving backwards or at the very least standing still, either way it's not good



Again Smith is being touted as a failure not because of a succcesful 2007 but because of failures since then. If New Zealands progression to win the world cup is classed as a success surely Englands failure to kick on from 2007 must be classed as a failure.

Let's just wait and see what happens in a months time, I'll be happy to come back and eat a bit of humble pie if I'm wrong.

My bad