|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote John Charnock="John Charnock"It also gets complicated if all three get their stadiums built (which I know you don't think is possible, Starbug).'"
Saints and Salford will have part built stadia by this time next year , it will be plain to see , there will be steelwork and concrete , but both will struggle to be finished for feb 2012
Cas and Wakey ? , Who knows if they will even have started but one thing is certain , they need to build them no matter what or where they end up , it cannot be a , no SL , no stadium situaton
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | Rochdale Hornets |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote J20="J20"TBF unlike the Wakey board we don't respond to his posts with 'praise be to the Lord' so may actually differ in opinions
not a pop at the guy whatsoever and he does some good work getting messgaes across on your board but sometimes people can be easily led by 'those in the know'.
What troubles me is your now saying none will be ready by start of 2012 realistically, so why are all clubs bar Saints saying this is the case?
I take it Wakey's is being paid for by the 'developer' and I can only presume will be reimbursed by rents of stadium and units... though that won't come at once so is the full capital their to push ahead as soon as get the nod? In times where their are empty units in some of the biggest urban cities will you fill all units and cover costs that way?'"
Wakefield have already said that Newmarket will not be ready for the start of the 2012 season and will be ready in April/May.... so that means they should stop and not bother then? The fact that in the next few weeks they could be (and I say only could be) in a position to confirm everything and get legally binding contracts in place AND start work on site prior to the formal announcement/decision should now count for nothing now then?
Ok, now I am being overly sarcastic but the point I am making is they have to give all the clubs right up to the deadline to get things sorted. If they don't they are pre-judging things. But also they do want to be sure that if contracts and deals are done that they are water-tight. The issue with the current SL clubs is that if they have indeed committed to contracts for new builds then you really have got to keep them in SL, it is a harsh reality but if you don't you are going to most probably send them to the wall!
Yorkcourt are not going to build empty units BTW, they will only build them when they have tenants for them. Colin Mackie of Yorkcourt has said in the Wakefield Express this morning that he expects the site to take 7 years to fill. Developers like this are in it for the long hall but they know you need to spend money to make money and they will probably still retain ownership of the land for the ground anyway!
|
|
|
|
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote J20="J20"Not really as Wakefiekd at last bids promised a move to a new rugby stadium. So to last min say oh were going to Barnsley wouldn't fit for me. At least Saints were clear about Widnes move if Wajey throw Barnsley cover inbit would just be more desperation again and another unfilled promise on stadium after years of plenty gone by.'"
I see where youre coming from,but i also see a slight dilemma.
Wakefield have already announced that they wont be at Belle Vue in 2012.
Come what may next season is the last at Belle Vue.
So if they do have a subsequent plan to play out of Oakwell while building is complete,i dont see how the RFL would have any option but to assess their facilities based on Oakwell.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1290 | Batley Bulldogs |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2016 | Apr 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Starbug="Starbug" ... it cannot be a "no SL, no stadium" situation.'"
I agree with Starbug (but I did take a few liberties with his punctuation to ease the shock).
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 557 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2011 | Mar 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote J20="J20"Problem here is as we've seen before a club will get the npd and then they could still say oh well X funding didn't actually come off or we thought this permission / safety issue would be covered by now and it isn't. That stuff can still happen after Savilles review.
As Starbug say's overall they will just be used as a tool to hide behind. They got lucky Widnes as a club didn't go against them after last round and Tricky Dicky got quite pally with SO'C to ensure we didn't cause any issues and we'll be rewarded for that. However they know if / when they boot a SL side out due to more severe financially implications they will be hit back at hard no matter who it is, so are simply looking for people to hide behind.
Lewis got utteryly burnt on NW tonight after last round of franchises so will now use this Rimmer bloke to have a full set of answers lined up and prob walk away the day after annnouncements to save any 'lay blame' messages.'"
Savilles will do as professional a job as possible to establish whether a stadium will be ready for Feb 2012. The RFL are behaving professionally by getting advice from specialists. Using Savilles reduces the likelihood of clubs playing fast and loose. It makes it even harder for them to cry foul after the decisions in July 2011.
Whether they use spcialists or not some people are desperate to bag the RFL.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 28736 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote TURFEDOUT="TURFEDOUT"I see where youre coming from,but i also see a slight dilemma.
Wakefield have already announced that they wont be at Belle Vue in 2012.
Come what may next season is the last at Belle Vue.
So if they do have a subsequent plan to play out of Oakwell while building is complete,i dont see how the RFL would have any option but to assess their facilities based on Oakwell.'"
Unfortunately it's not that simple. Oakwell is not a long term option.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6096 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Starbug="Starbug", it cannot be a , no SL , no stadium situaton'"
100% agree. Anyone who takes that attitude should be booted out IMO. RL needs teams who will use the SKY & RFL money to make the competition stronger at club and international level. All these clubs who live on that money to pay off various debts etc are in effect just a drain on our debt. Personally I really can't believe after 12 years or so Wakey haven't grew much further as a club despite the money and have what one playoff win, one cup semi to show for it on the pitch? Cone on that ain't right surely? If you can't afford to be in SL (sane for us in 2007 btw) then why not let someone else have a go why you take a few years in Championship? What they should if done with Crusaders and tbh Quins now too.
It's hard to stay competitive and develop in SL so drop down sort stadium & set up then come back much stronger.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | Rochdale Hornets |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Starbug="Starbug"Leigh did it , Widnes did it , Doncaster did it , Fax have done it
It isn't me that is making the stadium the issue here , it is the RFL , problem is they are that thick , they couldn't see this coming'"
You are spot on mate and if they don't make it in time then they will have to go down and do it the hard way like those clubs. Also, don't think I don't think that they deserve a place in SL because they may well do, but the point is here, is that the RFL have given them a deadline and made the new stadia the no 1 issue. If they do get started before the RFL deadline and Savills are convinced they are as water-tight as possible can you not see that they have to be allowed into SL.
I agree that Widnes and maybe Leigh should have got in last time but that was then and this is now. I don't support any of these clubs but not to allow them to at least try and get themselves sorted and if they do, turn them down because they are going to be 6 months late would be madness.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Inflatable_Armadillo="Inflatable_Armadillo"Wakefield have already said that Newmarket will not be ready for the start of the 2012 season and will be ready in April/May.... so that means they should stop and not bother then? The fact that in the next few weeks they could be (and I say only could be) in a position to confirm everything and get legally binding contracts in place AND start work on site prior to the formal announcement/decision should now count for nothing now then?
Ok, now I am being overly sarcastic but the point I am making is they have to give all the clubs right up to the deadline to get things sorted. If they don't they are pre-judging things. But also they do want to be sure that if contracts and deals are done that they are water-tight. The issue with the current SL clubs is that if they have indeed committed to contracts for new builds then you really have got to keep them in SL, it is a harsh reality but if you don't you are going to most probably send them to the wall!
Yorkcourt are not going to build empty units BTW, they will only build them when they have tenants for them. Colin Mackie of Yorkcourt has said in the Wakefield Express this morning that he expects the site to take 7 years to fill. =#FF0000Developers like this are in it for the long hall but they know you need to spend money to make money and they will probably still retain ownership of the land for the ground anyway!'"
And the clubs also should be in it for the long haul , and if some of that includes playing in the Championship and having to prove themselves as fit for SL , so be it
|
|
|
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Chris Dalton="Chris Dalton"Unfortunately it's not that simple. Oakwell is not a long term option.'"
I agree its not simple.
But if people dont want a club to be assessed on a stadia that might/might not be ready and as in Wakefields case,they wont be at their current home -- what can they assess their facilities on?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Inflatable_Armadillo="Inflatable_Armadillo"You are spot on mate and if they don't make it in time then they will have to go down and do it the hard way like those clubs. Also, don't think I don't think that they deserve a place in SL because they may well do, but the point is here, is that the RFL have given them a deadline and made the new stadia the no 1 issue. If they do get started before the RFL deadline and Savills are convinced they are as water-tight as possible can you not see that they have to be allowed into SL.
I agree that Widnes and maybe Leigh should have got in last time but that was then and this is now. I don't support any of these clubs but not to allow them to at least try and get themselves sorted and if they do, turn them down because they are going to be 6 months late would be madness.'"
All the stadium criteria is madness , but if you have it , you have to have a cut off date , that cut off date last time was the decision date , it shpould be the same again , tough call i know , but somewhere you have to draw a line
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote TURFEDOUT="TURFEDOUT"I agree its not simple.
But if people dont want a club to be assessed on a stadia that might/might not be ready and as in Wakefields case,they wont be at their current home -- what can they assess their facilities on?'"
They score nil
|
|
|
 |
|