as night follows day, you cant say anything about the NRL without looking silly.

you have been amusing the past couple of months

where did you hear that, ive not heard it.

Unlike you who is shown up on every thread he posts on - including this one - you are joke the more you post the more of an idiot you look - let's face it unless you are having extra marital sex there is no fun to be had - sad b@stard.

your nrl comments have been making my friends laugh for weeks.

you remember, nathan hindmarsh is a poor tackler, stacey jones is too old for the nrl etc

No he didnt, what ever happened has nothing to do with his job, especially when he wasnt even employed by them when the incident took place. It wasnt illegal, however it was unacceptable behaviour, but that doesnt mean you deserve to lose your job. I think some of you guys need to go out in the city at the weekend, and see the amount of girls throughing themselves at NRL players. Its got nothing to do with League, many guys in that situation would take advantage. None of those would lose there jobs...

He lost his job because of the media storm and show last week. If it hadnt of got out in that way, nothing would of changed even if channel 9 had known about it. Yes he lost his job becuase of the negative publicity which is unfair... When the other names come out, do you think they will lose there jobs??? No, because they are not high profile anymore.

well said.

people on here bagging johns will never have women throwing themselves at them so theyll never know what it feels like

The simplistic dialogue going on around this issue shows the limited intelligence of the vast majority.

A societal issue - the treatment of women - has been dumped at rugby league's doorstep.

Apparently, rugby league is responsible.

Fuck me dead...how long have you got for me to pick the holes in that one???

You and certain fellow posters don't get it.

You keep pretending that it is about some people having sex. It isn't.

Of course Johns has devastated his wife / kids / family by his sordid behaviour. he admits that.

What you fail to understand, probably because you have never had a senior managerial role in an organisation, is that businesses value their reputations and increasingly have a focus on social responsibility. They are free to choose NOT to employ a person who wants to take part in group sex infront of 12 other people.

However i am sure there are adult channels that dally messenger could list that would welcome Johns as a front man. He could even recreate famous RL gang bangs and entertain the knuckle draggers on here and elsewhere.

It has clearly come as a shock to some of the less evolved RL fans that many organisations and people will not admire, condone or employ gang bangers.

I see the morality police are getting into overtime on this subject!

The problem as I see it is whose morals are correct.

Who has the final say in what is moral or not.

Why is everything associated with sex, always taken as bad, nasty, sordid, etc., etc., yet it probably is the most enjoyable thing that humans beings can do with each other.

We don't know the full story and probaly never will. My life will continue however.

This is way beyond Dally's comprehension - let's face it he thinks you cannot have fun as a married man unless you are are having extra marital sex - that says everything you need to know about him.

If Johns had just had a normal affair he would still probably have his job - the fact he - a married man with children - participated/instigated DP with a group of other players watching brings into question his whole moral compass - is that the behaviour you would expect from a senior member of a reputable organisation - in these circumstance most senior people would be quietly asked to find alternative employment