Not really some Championship clubs will be very fairly treated , some wont

That's the way it is

Please lock this one.

I hate to think about all the time this has wasted for so many.

What utter garbage, four games in!

Agreed.

We can open it again after 7 games........only joking.

Let's at least give it a season before debating.

There are two types of fans that want expansion, those who want all clubs to grow and better themselves, whilst new clubs come into the fold, and those who only care about certain clubs, and would be happy to see 10 teams die out if it meant a couple of big city teams prosper. Both sides have there reasons, but as an RL fans i want all rl teams to prosper and belive in taking measures to do this, as opposed to helping some clubs but not others.

I think your right that a conferance system is the way we have to go, though i think we should aim for 2 12 team league (32 game season, with magic weekend) something like

leeds
bradford
huddersfield
wakefield
castleford
halifax/sheffield
hull fc
hull kr
quins
skolars
gateshead
scottish team

wigan
saints
widnes
salford
leigh
wire
catalans
toulouse
irish team
cumbrian team
celtic crusaders
birmingham/liecester

How did you get a 32-game season?

And if we got to that many teams (which won't happen for years, if ever!), you could maybe go with a three 8-team conferences, with another cup competition in the middle.

32 games a season is too many with playoffs and the challenge cup on top, your looking at elite players playing 40 games a year before any internationals,

plus 8 teams from yorkshire in a 12 team league? a bit much isnt it

because the existing club has failed to make the grade, they were given and opportunity to do so and they didnt do it,

so someone else gets a go,

Yes I agree that if a club has done nothing and made no improvements at all then they could and should be demoted.

I think though that there is every possibility given the three year license that every club should be able to demonstrate major improvements in many of the franchise criteria so that they are at least well on the way to being at least B license clubs which would be more than any Championship club could do.

I just think it's going to be very hard for a club outside of SL to be demonstrably better than any existing SL club in three years time.

i dont think it will be hard, i think it will be nigh on impossible for any championship to prove itself better than an SL club in three years time,

which is why those making the franchise decision will take into account whether the club was in the championship or in SL when it looks at what that club has done over the past few years

I'll jump on the band wagon and strongly suggest that at the end of this 3 years SL will be the same as it is and there will STILL be no place for a couple of teams who believe they have a divine right to be there.

If, there is any alteration it will be eitherbe by an additional club or a team away from the heartlands will replace a set of planks (if they blow their existing SL franchise then that is the ONLY conclusion).

However this is RL and strange things happen that mystify and bemuse.

Whilst i realise that is alot of games a season, i think in the long run rl is going to have to have bigger sqauds and a rule that a player can only play say, 25-30 games a season, which will give more chances for young players.

I roughly divided the leagues into east and west (less travel means more people can attend away games and derbies are preserved) with both sides having expansion clubs included. Yorkshire is the heartland of rl too with more sustainable (or potentially sustainable) clubs than anywhere else and these clubs should be given the chance to thrive in sl. Yorkshire is 4 counties as well so considering the 2 counties of lancashire/cheshire has 6 teams 8 split between 3 counties isnt that much of a stretch.

Using dico's method from earlier on in the thread but with more teams.

Well his method doesn't add up either then.
10 team conference, H&A Whilst i realise that is alot of games a season, i think in the long run rl is going to have to have bigger sqauds and a rule that a player can only play say, 25-30 games a season, which will give more chances for young players.'"