Shaw was carrying the ball and lost it, Leeds was a grubber that Keinhorst got a finger too.

HTH.

Shaw didn't lose the ball but, don't let the facts cloud your judgement.

I didn't see any obstruction but agree with the grounding, ridiculous.

His hand hit the ball while it was on the ground. What more do you want? I dislike Leeds as much as the next man but, that was a try.

Sorry worded it wrong.

Personally don't think he lost it but that's how it was 'judged' but it's a different and incomparable incident to the Keinhorst one tonight.

A guy carrying the ball having to been judged (rightly or wrongly) to have lost contact is a different scenario to a player putting a hand or finger on a loose ball and thus shouldn't be compared on here by people wanting to rant.

So, you thought tonight's was a try?

Keinhorst's finger was bent at 90 degrees as it hit the floor. Indisputably a try.

Of course. I am amazed how anyone can say it was not a try!

Yep. The only issue on that try was the possibility of obstruction. The grounding was clear.

I don't think a slight brush of the finger should constitute a try. Saying that, Hudds wouldn't have scored at the other end if Hall didn't knock on. All in all, it was an intriguing bottom of the table clash, and it showed.

most Leeds fans near me on the western terrace were very surprised to see that given, but that's life.

I thought it was never a try until you saw the slow mo replay. clearly showed there was downward pressure.
it shows why we need the video ref, albeit when they do their job properly

In th two games I watched this week there has been far two much whist made even worse by the fact that Hicks pretty much all came in the first half, and Silverwood only decided to penalise on team per half.

Silverwood proved in that game why he's a poor ref. Repeatedly penalised Leeds in the first half because he got annoyed with Hardaker, then did the same to Hudds in the 2nd half because he got annoyed at Brough.
He can't stop his emotions getting in the way.