I can get away with not taking my Wife to the Trailfinders ground as its not an over nighter, but if i went to Toronto which is an overnight stay I'm 99.9% sure my wife would want to come along but not for the game but for the shopping

The minimum criteria for stadiums was ignored years ago

Hopefully it won't have umpteen different coloured lines like Toronto. Drove me mad looking at that.
Must be distracting for the players.

If the RFL do say London can't play there, where would be a viable alternative? Loftus Road or Griffin Park perhaps?

Looking forward to going, miss the day out at London, loved it when they played at Brentford, pub on each corner. Wonder if there is any traction in looking at playing at Brentfords new ground. 18k capacity

I believe they have already given it approval

Trailfinders is better than a 4/5 empty ground IMHO.

They've built a stand now behind the sticks where the away fans stood on the open terrace, I've stood there a few times with a plastic bucket filled with ice with 5 cans of VB in it, so classy

They used Griffin Park when last in SL

Whilst they've previously played at Griffin Park, I thought they were playing at Barnet when they lost their SL status?

Agree with this. Trailfinders is of a size that suits the likely attendance range for London's games, making them play in a larger ground that would be almost empty just because it has a bigger capacity would be pointless. It would also create a financial millstone around the club's neck to do so.

anyone got any pics of the ground for those of us who haven't seen it before?

Am I right in saying that the Broncos play on a 3G pitch?

Put it into google images. I’m not sure it can even be called a stadium, it’s a club house.

Fire safety certificate is 3,017........will I arrange for it be increased for your visit you troll?