Could this finally be the return of Great Britain! Please please please please!

The international pinnacle of the game to return? Let's hope so.

It was barmy to get rid of it in the first place. Would Union get rid of Lions Tours? Not on your nelly.

If they announce an Ashes Series to be held down under in 2015 I will be cracking open the piggy bank!

if it goes ahead it will be in the southern hemisphere.

It's exactly what is needed and shouldn't have been got rid of in the first place. It should have run alongside the Tri/4 Nations comps

I know im in the minority but Ashes tour once every 4/5 years and the rest of time keep the home nations. So pretty much what RU do. Keep GB as something special

Agreed. I'd like to see a 4 year schedule of:
2013 - World Cup
2014 - 4 Nations (as England in NH)
2015 - Ashes (as GB obviously)
2016 - 4 Nations (as England in SH)
2017 - World Cup

Plus I'd like a mid-season 5 Nations of England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland & France based on the RU 6 Nations format. I know it's more games for the top players but if the Exiles games are done away with that saves 2. So a mid-season 5 Nations would only actually add 2 games to the schedule. I also understand the gap between England and the rest but that should narrow a bit with the return of GB and the only way it'll narrow further is for the teams to play each other.

Ashes series would be brilliant! Really hope this comes off!

To win it you have to beat Australia twice which is what is great about it. The WC and 4N only requires you to beat Australia once which isn't as great an achievement IMO. See NZ who have won a couple of 4N's and the WC but didn't beat the Aussies twice in any of them tournaments.

I'd say the World Cup is the international pinnacle, and if it isn't it bloody should be!

More games against the Aussies, well can't complain with that!
Return if GB? Not particularly bothered if it was England to be honour. They'll be the exact same team on paper.

I think people ignore the fact that it isn't just about playing against the Aussies that's the carrot. It's having a significantly higher chance of playing in a competitive team with a chance if winning.

Not only that, but these players are actually ENGLISH! If they're good enough and the door is open, why wouldn't they want to play for their home nation?

I must apologise to NZ, they did beat the Aussies twice in the 05 Tri Nations

This fat idiot is going to ruin the international game.

They are English but the best chance of the other home nations having a team that have at least a chance of competing (not winning necessarily but getting within 30 points for example as opposed to 70 point hammerings) today, not in 30 years time (maybe) if given a development officer, is to use heritage players who qualify to play for them. They then keep going with heritage players from SL and NRL if they can get them so that they have a team that young kids can see [inow[/i that can put in a good effort against England and France at least. That team though they may come from Dewsbury, Pontefract, St Helens and Brisbane will give those Welsh, Scottish and Irish kids a team that they can look up to and can encourage them to want to play the game themselves. When those kids have grown up then they may get a team that were born in the actual country they represent but for now they need a team of any eligible players but one that can at least compete with FT players pulling on England and France jerseys.

If more of the likes of Brough, Clark, McIlorum etc stuck with the nations they played for in the last WC rather than switching then those teams might well have a chance of becoming competitive.

Also most of the players concerned are not good enough to make the England team so are going from a team where they are getting picked and a star name to kicking their heels behind two or three others and not playing at all.