Fans of nobody teams, laughing at wigan.

How small time.

Teams like Huddersfield can only dream of playing in games like that.

Mcclennan wants the match review committee to look at McGuire getting injured cheating. he's got a brass neck he has

Danny Maguire is a blatant cheat and then he feigns injury to avoid being repramanded. I'm calling for a lifetime ban.

This is a Rugby League forum. Never heard of Danny Maguire.

New to RL?

Somehow Carmont has been characterised as some sort of speed merchant in the light of this incident. Presuming that he would go 55-60m without anyone running him down is nothing more than a fairy story. Alibert/someone else's decision to give a penalty to Wigan way down in Leeds territory was a golden chance for Wigan they did not deserve.

But the Man of Steel-in-waiting blew it big time.

We will never know.

I also think that Maguires injury is more to do with an accidental kick to the knee from Carmonts trailing leg as he was being held back.

No, 1989. A decade before the RFL saved you by forcing you to merge with Sheffield.

Correct answer.

you'll be fully aware then that our nothing team has beaten wigan at wigan for the last 3 years i assume?

Fans of losing team, laughing at Huddersfield.

Teams like Hull can only dream of winning a play-off game.

You tell em brother

i agree.

wigans blatant cheating to win penalties was a disgrace.

they dished it out.........

agreed. The penalty should have been against mcguire and not donald who was already committed.

In that scenario they'd have kicked to touch and had 1 chance to kick an equalising drop goal.

Assuming they do get this (a big assumption) the game then goes to extra time where it's anyones game again.

They certainly werent robbed like some wigan fans will claim.

Donald was certainly committed. he was committed to taking Richards out. He realised he couldn't get to him before Richards kicked, and so decided he was taking him out.

McGuire's holding back of Carmont was far worse, though. Donald made his decision to take Richards out on the spur of the moment, but McGuire cynically made sure there would be no supporting player, who would have made it 2 on 1. I can just about accept Donald's "tackle" as illegal but one of those things, but I hate it when I see blatant and deliberate cheating like McGuire's.

If I had been the ref I would have given a penalty try, as one of the clearest cases of a deserved penalty try I can recall, not one but two professional fouls. I could legitimately do it, too, as all it needs is if "in the opinion of the ref a try would have been scored". Well, with Carmont free to support, in my opinion a try would have been scored.
(a) Richards could still have kicked, but would have had no need to.
(b) Richards could have followed his kick, if still kicking, and scored if not fouled;
(c) Richards could have passed to the supporting Carmont who would have had a walk-in.

Some would argue that a try "was not certain" but it doesn't need to be, as long as the ref can say he thought a try would have been scored.

And the clincher is that it is in the interests of the game that teams cannot progress by blatant cheating, which arguably Donald's actions, and certainly McGuire's exemplary cheating, were. It would be fair and just to give a penalty try, in those rare circumstances where such blatant professional cheating has taken place with the sole intention of trying to cheat your way to victory (as there is no way Wigan could have kicked a goal from where McGuire cheated).

The alternative is what we have - Wigan miss a kick from the touchline, and Leeds go through benefiting from their cheating. I know which I would prefer.