Point in question. Rich bloke (sent down for money laundering) blindly patriotic for his beloved home town soccer team going absolutely no where fast,builds 25k stadium in a fit of overly zealous optimism.The team Darlington now languishing in the relegation zone of the conference league averaging 1.5 - 2k attendances,so yes the story of Darlington is a lesson in pretty bad management

How hard can this be? I'm talking specifically about skills that are bound to rules of the game which have changed and consequent specialised skills. Listen to someone like Alex Murphy talking about the techniques he used in combination with Vince Karalius around the scrum base. Few of those skills would be of use today as they were necessitated by contested scrums. Consider tackling techniques such as the Cumberland Throw. You cannot deny it is a skill and one that is very difficult to execute properly.



Coaches worked within the rule structures of the day to deliver players best suited to gain a competitive advantage. Just as is the case today. Some coaches concentrated more on specialist skills. Others concentrated more on fitness. At Saints there is all manner of history relating to coaches who did one or the other at different periods.

It's not surprising that we have got better at strength, stamina and speed given that a) we're fully pro and b) we prize such attributes highly.

It's arrogant beyond belief to claim that we are now better at training given that your evidence is improvement to attributes we prize and thus concentrate on. A championship-winning coach back then could just as easily claim he is the best at delivering players that excel in the prized attributes of his day. He might also point out that his players go out and beat Australia - in Australia - whereas ours don't.

It's like saying Alexander the Great can't hold a candle to Wellington because the latter has cannons.



I said Keiron Cunningham is entirely lacking the specialist skills hookers back in the sixties were expected to possess in contested scrums. If you're stupid enough to think this means I consider him unable to pass the ball out of the dummy half I can't help you.

It is perfectly reasonable to emphasise Cunningham's physical attributes because without size, strength and speed he would be what?



Really? How much old rugby league do you watch?



Not one player at all. Prior to last season Saints' attitude to kicking (out of hand, goal kicking, 40/20 etc.) has, on the whole, varied between abysmal and average since the retirement of Tommy Martyn. Saints won two titles with some of the worst goal-kicking ever seen at the club. Hardly an advert for superior training.



Briers is a better kicker than Long. But Warrington have had plenty of good kicking halves over the years - including Murphy, whose kicking was a major factor in Warrington's success when he was player-coach.



I'm not lambasting anyone. It's you who can't cope with the possibility that older players might be just as skilful albeit in different aspects of the game. If someone points out this fact you hide behind the nonsense argument "THOSE skills are obsolete". Which contradicts your position by first agreeing that players were skilled in different aspects of the game but then attempts to squirm out of it by judging the past in today's context. Which is nonsensical because players from the past have equal right to judge today's RL by yesteryear's standards. Or are they obsolete, too? 3.8134765625:5