I don't know what sector of the construction industry you are in mate but the whole of the construction industry revolves around paper, from drawings, calculations, programmes, specifications, scope of works, codes of practise, risk assessments, health & safety packs, cost plans and finally contracts and therefore money!

Pull them down ? , in what way ?

So Salford , Wakey and Cas are only going to build if they get to stay in SL , so what happens if they bring back Promotion and relegation

" Sorry you cant relegate us , we've had the council build us a shiney new stadium "

No it doesn't work like that , if it did then Doncaster , then Leigh and then Fax should have been promoted as soon as they got a stadium sorted

If the stadium is dependant on continuous SL membership then tough you dont get a stadium

Last time you had to have PLAYED IN the stadium for it to be counted , same should apply this time , no problem then is there

Totally untrue. Savilles will advise the RFL on the readiness of stadiums re Feb 2012 and this will be considered when the 'facilities criteria' are being rated. Savilles will not be used to assess the other categories.

None of which you can actually play RL in

How long can clubs constantly keep breaking promises , only one thing matters

Steel, concrete and bricks , with a pitch covered with grass in the middle , anything else is just paper , not a stadium

At this moment in time there is only ONE criteria that will guarantee either Cas,Wakey or Salford a SL place in 2012

A stadium , everything else at this moment is irrelivant , and you know that , they are all level pegging on virtually all the other crieria

If two get a stadium , the one that doesn't goes down , it really is that simple , it only gets complicated when none of them get a stadium , thats why the RFL need a ' Patsy ' to blame

TBF unlike the Wakey board we don't respond to his posts with 'praise be to the Lord' so may actually differ in opinions

not a pop at the guy whatsoever and he does some good work getting messgaes across on your board but sometimes people can be easily led by 'those in the know'.

What troubles me is your now saying none will be ready by start of 2012 realistically, so why are all clubs bar Saints saying this is the case?

I take it Wakey's is being paid for by the 'developer' and I can only presume will be reimbursed by rents of stadium and units... though that won't come at once so is the full capital their to push ahead as soon as get the nod? In times where their are empty units in some of the biggest urban cities will you fill all units and cover costs that way?

They refused to acknowledge it existed , despite walking round it 3 months earlier , not a case of lack of backbone , just outright corruption , instead they praised the Celtic Crusaders for having ' plans ' for a new stadium near Bridgend , that worked out well , didn't it

I can't believe you can't grasp this, for start they will have another three years if they do bring back promotion & relegation.

So, with your rules Salford, Castleford, Wakey and now also Saints have to give up before the deadline. That is fine, someone tell Salford Council that they can keep there £20m because it is all over before the have even filled out the application forms. There is no point in investing in us because we are are all in NL1.

Widnes, Leigh & Halifax and one other are in, done deal... so now how does the system look and how do the RFL look? That's right, we are not interested in anyone investing in these 4 clubs anyway we never wanted them to get new facilities and new grounds... they all just looked like they could have the potential to be as successful as Warrington and who wants that. Widnes, Leigh and Halifax have great grounds as well, we don't need any more!

It also gets complicated if all three get their stadiums built (which I know you don't think is possible, Starbug).

Problem here is as we've seen before a club will get the npd and then they could still say oh well X funding didn't actually come off or we thought this permission / safety issue would be covered by now and it isn't. That stuff can still happen after Savilles review.

As Starbug say's overall they will just be used as a tool to hide behind. They got lucky Widnes as a club didn't go against them after last round and Tricky Dicky got quite pally with SO'C to ensure we didn't cause any issues and we'll be rewarded for that. However they know if / when they boot a SL side out due to more severe financially implications they will be hit back at hard no matter who it is, so are simply looking for people to hide behind.

Lewis got utteryly burnt on NW tonight after last round of franchises so will now use this Rimmer bloke to have a full set of answers lined up and prob walk away the day after annnouncements to save any 'lay blame' messages.

Leigh did it , Widnes did it , Doncaster did it , Fax have done it

It isn't me that is making the stadium the issue here , it is the RFL , problem is they are that thick , they couldn't see this coming

Surely you can see an issue were sides outside SL are expected to have up to scratch facilities on what 1/5 of the budget with no SKY money etc yet some sides in SL have happily just took every penny and invested it where exatcly?

Leigh got their stadium done in time for 2008, Widnes got ours sorted outside of SL, why should anyone else with much more money coming in be any different? Save the economy excuse as well as sides ignored the good times to fill the directors pockets!