Whilst only 4 clubs have won it, the competitiveness of the clubs is the closest it's been IMO.

If Leeds can win a treble in a Salary Cap season, imagine how dominant they'd be with no salary cap. I think a 4 club comp is optimistic, it'd likely just be Wigan & Leeds each year, baring the odd blip or some billionaire waltzing in and buying everything up.

The whole reason we have this Super 8's system is because we didn't have 14 competitive clubs. Imagine the league with no Salary Cap.


What get's me about this situation and some of the posts on here saying "RIP Salary Cap" etc, is that Koukash wanted this all along. He wanted rid of the Salary Cap in a bid to take short cuts and get quick success.

High profile controversy in the SC system which could ultimately bring the salary cap tumbling down after 20 years - who stands to win? Who gets what they wanted all along?

Losing the SC doesn't necessitate a free for all. Perhaps it's time we looked at a better way of achieving what we want to achieve.

The first step is actually deciding what it is that we want to achieve.

Only three clubs won the league title in the 10 years before the salary cap was brought in.

Wigan won it 8 times and used their spending power to monopolise the competition, buying up talent from other clubs.

I don't want to see a repeat of that.

What he said.

Are you saying that either a total disregard or a scrapping of the S.C. doesn’t affect the game?

I presume you are referring to the governing body when you talk of having no affect, but after all they are just the custodians & are ultimately answerable to the clubs. I don’t believe, if it went to a vote, the twelve clubs would vote in a scrapping of the cap.

If it turns out that a number of clubs are using underhand methods to circumvent the system, there’s no wonder the same clubs continue to be successful.

The irony of the whole situation though, is little old Salford becoming implicated, whilst achieving the square route of sod all.

the same 'old' teams winning the SL trophy etc seem to be the ones who have invested heavily in their academy/youth systems over the past years/decade


maybe your club should do that instead of going for the quick fix like warrington did a couple of years ago, at least they now realise you have to bring youth through which enables you to spend that little extra on quality players, something tha leeds, saints and wigan have had the luxury of doing over the past years

Well firstly only 7 would need to vote to scrap it. But yes, I'm not saying scrapping the cap won't effect the game I'm saying it doesn't actually affect the RFL themselves and questioning their stomach for the fight.

I'd also question a lot of the clubs stomach for it aswell. Wakefield for instance may want to keep the cap, are they comfortable to actually committing funds to fight for it if necessary?

At if Leeds win the title this season, we will have had 3 winners in 10 years, with Leeds winning 7 of those. Not an awful lot of difference.

True. And I'm pretty confident there will be different answers from different clubs too.

Rugby League has too much legislation, along with very weak enforcement. From the routinely ignored anti-tampering deadline, to the constant retreat of the fed-trained rule and the many loopholes in the salary cap. Not forgetting the comedy of the licensing criteria.

Even when a team is caught breaking the rules, the tariffs are next to meaningless. Wigan's flagrant disregard of the of the salary cap - 4 points, Leeds disguised player loans to Fev and Hunslet - £2000(!), and plenty of others. The RFL lacks independence and the will to really deal with breaches - their life would be made easier if they had fewer, simpler rules, yet they are forever adding complexity and changing direction.

I'm not by instinct a de-regulator. But if rules aren't respected and enforced, they're worse than useless. Wigan and Leeds free of the cap is a bit scary, but if there was the pay-off every club having greater freedom to run their affairs their own way, for better or worse, it might be worth it.

It's part of the reason for their success, but one that is massively overstated IMO. Their ability to invest in [uall aspects[/u of the club/team is why they have dominated. The focus on 'doing things the right way' is a perfectly natural image for the club to want to project, but it's only part of the picture.

The thing about Wire's quick fix is that it worked (eventually

) - despite the lack (relative to the other successful clubs) of academy graduates, they won three Challenge Cups and went to two GFs.

The more obvious, if less romantic, correlation is not between on-field success and investment in youth but on-field success and finance. Stretching the cap by exploiting loopholes is probably at least as important as the academy production line.