According to that article he isn’t the only person at Wakefield getting involved inquiring about it. Whilst he’s been given a job to see how the RFL spend their money that doesn’t naturally equate to inquiring about Odsal’s availability for Wakefield’s use in 2017.

That article say Wakey originally wanted to use Odsal in 2017, not buy it which came this year, so talk of making sure “fair offers” from the RFL come up don’t add up completely.

I'm not sure why you think it doesn't as up. In 2017 we were getting messed around by the grounds new owners 88m, so Trinity's owners obviously got in touch with local teams like Bradford, Featherstone and Dewsbury which were the preferred ground if it came to it. But in the end, everything worked itself out.

Over a year after that, Carter was given by the other SL chairman the job to look into how and where the RFL have spent money and whether SL clubs were getting value for it. I'm not sure what doesn't add up tbh.

the article even says -
nothing more is mentioned apart from what Chalmers has heard in news reports.

So long story short, a couple of board members got in touch about the use of the ground in 2017, came to nothing because it's an obvious non-starter. Then in 2018 MC is doing his job looking into RFL affairs for SL owners.
Looks like you're looking for something that isn't there Printer. As I mentioned earlier, one of the main points being owners of clubs can't have vested interests in other clubs anyway - so really should put an end to it.

no further absurd than the RFL owning it

Just because that’s what you’ve decided it must be what Carter is doing doesn’t make it true.

weak..



that door swings both ways


obviously

All I said is something doesn’t add up, I haven’t said ‘this’ is what he’s doing like it’s a fact.

Well do you actually know what your saying then, or are you just trying to create something from nothing.

Even if Carter was appointed by the other SL chairmen to look into RFL expenditure. That doesn’t equate to him artificially raising the price of Bradford’s lease.

The fact Hudgell is involved as well points to more than just ensuring financial probity at the RFL. It points more to 2 club owners getting annoyed at what they perceive to be another club benefitting from RFL action while they are not.

It means that he has done exactly what he was charged to do by the other SL chairman, the fact Hudgell is involved does not automatically mean Carter has any other involvement as implied by the Bulls chairman.

I haven't decided anything i made an educated guess it's why MC was involved. The post is about what you said though, which was I just corrected you about the 2 people from Trinity that got in touch with the Bulls, which as it says in the article was about the use of the ground in 2017, and as the Bulls say it came to nothing because we sorted out rent with 88m.
Then you finished that post with this,
Not sure if you're just making mischief but it's clear from your own posts, you understand there was contact in 2017 about the use of the ground and then Chalmers has heard Carter and Hudgell are in for buying the lease, which as I say is against RFL rules anyway but you almost dismiss his job that was given near the start of 2018 to look into the RFL finances and where they've been spent, which £1.3 million was on the Bulls and rather think the worse it seems - bet you wouldn't if it was GH.

He can examine the details of any sale of the lease by the RFL as much as he wants.
If he has artificially raised the price of the lease (or attempted to) he has gone way beyond his remit.

Out of interest what was the market rate for the Odsal lease back when the RFL bought it, not the amount Hood said Bradford needed to survive but the actual market rate?