Meanwhile Weyman will cop a ban for mouthing at his team mate, wouldn't expect any less from the RFL.

m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league ... zr50w.html Food for thought regarding a ban. Funny how all those up in arms missed this. Not a peep from the aggrieved then.

m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league ... zr50w.html Food for thought regarding a ban. Funny how all those up in arms missed this. Not a peep from the aggrieved then.

Possibly because not every RL fan reads, researches, and studies every last piece of RL journalism from all over the world to gather together a cognitive response to whatever potential talking point may arise.

Your point is not a point at all. It's like if there's some crowd trouble at a Hull v HKR match and me digging up an article from the other side of the world regarding crowd trouble. Then telling everyone else they are over reacting over here because they'd never seen that article.

There's no motivation. People see the vid, see what he says and form an opinion that he's been a bit naughty. Except Leeds fans, who see it but let it pass through the visual cortex, allowing it to bypass the 'Sense and reason' part of the brain, then let it flood through their fingers and emerge as every excuse except the most obvious.

Like a huge bunch of Nelsons all stating in unison 'I see no ships!'

You are full of it. where are the leeds fans excuses? I havent offered any. I just dont think those bleeting really give 2 f**ks about gay rights. Thats what I think stinks. If Hardaker is guilty then through the book at him which for saying fag is about 2 games.

Someone got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning. Loads of Leeds fans excuses. On the forums, on social media. But I don't need to tell you that as you scour the planet of RL news every day...

You're probably right on that one.

You'll give a toss, especially if he drops a third bollock, and in the nrl it'll be publicised over two new sources at the very least, according to you.

Hardaker should get at least a 5 game ban. And Leeds should give him another fine, double whatever was given to him last November. And if he was really given a formal, final warning by the club when that happened, his contract should be terminated.

The more simpleton elements of the Leeds support (such as some of those posting on here) will never get it - probably because they're not so disimilar to Hardaker in many ways. He's a chav done good. For a while - 2012 to 2013 - he was my absolute favourite player, but his outstanding performances are not enough to mitigate the less impressive aspects of his character which have become clear with greater exposure. If nothing else, his lifestyle choices won't be viewed particularly favourably by Sinfield and that's can be a career-breaker at Leeds.