Which is an American thing I believe?

It also look quite awful, you can keep it.

It may well be American.....but I can assure you, you'll have to go a long way to get a more moist chicken.

Look at this thread....it's gone all Delia...

Let's be 'avin ya!

Luckily I'm able to cook a chicken properly without shoving a beer can up its arris and sticking it on a gas BBQ but yet again each to is own

It seems that Australia offers Sam Burgess his preferred lifestyle. Sam Burgess is in process of becoming an Australian citizen. That is why I just can't see him blowing his his highly paid, high profile, high prestige job at South Sydney Rabbitohs (where he is routinely rated one of the top 10 players in the NRL), for a precarious "challenge" and uncertain future in an English rugby union, whose relevant national and club authorities have not even approached him.

Daily mail (fail) backpage splash tomorrow, it's a done deal, £500k fee + one of the highest earners in Rugby.
Tapped up by the gobe Andy Farrell.

www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyu ... plans.html

www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyu ... plans.html

It seemed credible up until they said the fee was £500k. Not a chance in hell that they would sell him for that.

The fee is probalby only compensation for the remainder of his contract and a gesture seeing as he's moving sports rather than clubs.

It wouldn't drive him to make the move but it might be a small factor, he moves and there is more than likely more game time for his brothers.

Very disappointed, Farrell the snake.

Must be going for peanuts if the club signing him are to stay under the cap. The good performance against SBW must have gone to his head, he'll be trying his hand at boxing next.

The fee isn't paid to him, it's paid to souths, who are, all told loaded. Hence 500k seems suspiously small to convince them to sell.

This is straight out of your Rah Rah party manual, right?

I know, the point is he's moving sports, he could just walk away from his contract and Souths would have to pursue him for breach of contract, there is no framework whereby they could pursue his new club.

Yes there is, if that were true, contracts would be even more meaningless than they are already in sport. Any new club/ company would be liable for any settlement the souths demanded, regardless of what sport they played. If they refused, souths would take it court and will either use sam personally for the price deemed a suitable transfer price for him (which his new team will ultimately be responsible for), or he is put in jail for breach of contract.

In that scenario it's similar to the breach of contract Harris was guilty of when he signed for Bradford. How well did that go for bradford?

The only way he could use your argument is if he told souths he was desperately unhappy ...

Edit: I'm not denying this now seems an eminent possibility I'm just saying for 500,000 I'd of chipped in at saints for the signature!