Dally, I told you - I'm not interested. I'm sure you'll find someone special (with the emphasis on [ispecial[/i).

Hate to say this ,but your a wan ker!

Thank you, but I'm still not interested.

Hate to say this ,but your a wan ker!

Are the mods hoping this will just fizzle out?

It keeps you from other threads, so they probably think it's a good thing.

I'm happy enough - the last 2 pages have earned me a qualification as a special needs teacher in Australia, with little to no effort.

It's also gained me a couple of admirers, which I'm less enthused by. I think this is why the NRL players seem to get into trouble with allegations of sexual assault so regularly - they think someone pointing out that they're dullards is some sort of expression of romantic interest, or a come on.

im sorry. im back now

Back to discussion.


Any measure of any realistic variable indicates that Rugby League have been, and always will be first in this country.

Have you seen the Foxtel TV ratings for the aussie rules? Typical matches rate 80,000. Typical NRL matches rate 200-250,000. We may not get the same crowds as the AFL but we're number one where it really matters.

Hmmm.

You also didn't mention that the AFL TV contract is better.

Which it shouldn't be, but hey - there's 2 important measures that AFL comes out on top with. So best not to blow your trumpets too loud, because there's still a little way to go before dominance is assured in Aus.

I think they'll do it, mind.

That's because we have a bogan running the NRL and once his gone and replaced the better.

Now [ithat's[/i something we agree on - I think the NRL deserves better.

I find him singularly uninspiring. I'm convinced [iI[/i could do as good a job as him, and I'm happy to admit I have [ino idea[/i how to run a competition.

I would run it for a case of beer!