I like how you changed that post from "Is it you?" to that. You know why you changed it? Because you realised that I said this

So, to quote you: "someone else who has the inability to read!"
Nowhere did I say Leeds had no injuries. And if you are trying to argue that 2 injuries to a crap centre in Toopi and a 2nd-rower in Lauitiiti is a significant amount of injuries to key players, then you really are showing yourself up!

The facts are that it doesn't matter who were favourites that doesn't win you the trophy. But as you said...



You could always actually discuss the matter of the thread whenever you choose to of course.

That is true, and no-one has said that isn't the case. But the fact is that Leeds didn't walk the title, and to claim so is ridiculous!


Well I do believe it was you who got your knickers in a twist about my original post in relation to the discussion, so I will start back there:

I don't think Hull will finish top two. I'm not sure about where Leeds will finish, as they will no doubt bottle it again mid-season.

(And I hope you realise that all of this is in relation to the TABLE, not the play-offs).

So why try and raise the bookies favourite as an issue? Dolt.

If it takes taking the foot off the gas mid-season the walk the GF again I will be more than happy.

As for FC, third isn't unobtainable...

Lower than fifith will require the injury excuse again.

Because it was an indication of how much you "walked" the season. So much so that you weren't even favourites to win it. If you'd walked the season, you'd have (unless something bad happened the week before) been the favourites.


So would I, but it lost you the CC and the LLS though. Sooner or later you might wanna be more ambitious and do more than winning the GF from 2nd!



Well we have lost our first choice FB, one of our first choice wingers and centres, one of our impact props hasn't arrived yet and our star signing hasn't even got a visa yet. Just imagine how good we'll be if we get all these in the same squad.
They may not be as significant losses in key positions as losing Toopi and Lauitiiti, but at least it hasn't cost us top-spot yet!

I love debating SL championships with Gateshead fans and their vast experience of winning them.

Nice to see they have a stock of excuses for flopping again and it's only March.

I agree it is highly likely that Gateshead/FC (sorry you don't like it but I've been in contact with Companies House) will end up higher than the disappointing second from bottom this year.

As for when they lose, as is the issue of this thread, we don't know. They may pull off wins against the better teams like Leeds, Saints and KR, they may lose to less strong like cas and wire.

You're trying to sound smart and coming off extremely badly. Well done. Tell me, is it the company that score points on the pitch, or the team? And what is the team called? Infact, what is the company called? 'Cos it aint Gateshead/FC

Still waiting for this answer on how you supporting Leeds and me supporting Hull makes any difference as to discussing the SL championship!

Personally I thought it would be more polite to discuss the issue of the thread. I've given my opinion regarding this as you will see from my last post.

As an aside would you like to tell us all what the mish-mash club is actually legally called?

And the award for the most blantant trolling attempt in RLfans history goes to....

So sorry chaps but in yet another attempt to pull this thread on topic...

Which game do you think FC will lose?

Also do you think FC will perform better than last year's performance?

Shouldn't ask "asides" then.


I see you've given up on the Gateshead comments

I personally think Hull will lose their first game of the season against Harlequins away (round 7) because we always seem to lose down there. Bradford away is very winable in their position at the moment, and I think we'll have too much for Cas at home. I think Cas will beat us in Murrayfield though.

Who do you think Leeds will lose to first?