|
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Expansion. Vs consolidation thread |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9078 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Between 1998 and 2008 we had, I think, four clubs that proved capable of winning silverware. In the subsequent decade we've had eight by my reckoning (Saints, Wire, Cas, Hull, Hudds, Wigan, Catalans & Leeds). I'm not too fussed whether the competition is strengthened in the next decade by traditional or expansion clubs adding to the list of challengers but whichever can do that will be those that evolve. In contrast, those that offer their fans zero hope of success will be those that struggle - whether they be in Canada or Calderdale.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 1789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2016 | 8 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Areas of the country with no top Premier League side or top RU side:
Southport
Grimsby
Lincoln
Stoke
Chester
Sunderland
Plymouth
Shrewsbury
Blackpool
York
Peterborough
Southend-on-sea
Portsmouth
Derby
Preston
Lancaster
Middlesbrough
Bradford
Aldershot and Farnborough
Barnsley
Luton
Milton Keynes
Crawley
Mansfield
Swindon
Peterborough
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1592 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2024 | Sep 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| London, Sheffield, Cardiff, Gateshead, Kent, Mansfield...all tried and failed in varying degrees. The expansionists can dress this up in which ever way they see fit, add some cliched business speak and call the traditionalists "flat cappers". The truth of the matter is, it been tried before and failed. Invest the misappropriated funding in the grass roots and build from there.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9078 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: spegs "London, Sheffield, Cardiff, Gateshead, Kent, Mansfield...all tried and failed in varying degrees. The expansionists can dress this up in which ever way they see fit, add some cliched business speak and call the traditionalists "flat cappers". The truth of the matter is, it been tried before and failed. Invest the misappropriated funding in the grass roots and build from there.'"
Fair comment. There is a lot of clichéd business speak doing the rounds. Unfortunately "invest in the grass roots" sounds equally intangible. Care to expand a bit?
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 1789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2016 | 8 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: spegs "London, Sheffield, Cardiff, Gateshead, Kent, Mansfield...all tried and failed in varying degrees. The expansionists can dress this up in which ever way they see fit, add some cliched business speak and call the traditionalists "flat cappers". The truth of the matter is, it been tried before and failed. Invest the misappropriated funding in the grass roots and build from there.'"
London- full of top football and has RU teams
Sheffield- a football city
Cardiff- Prem footy team and RU hotbed
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 808 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Aug 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Psychedelic Casual "Areas of the country with no top Premier League side or top RU side
York and Bradford already have structures in place. Would it really be that difficult to get them back (in Bradfords case) into the top flight in an expanded SL with no stupid loop fixtures? As the ‘easy option’, ie; clubs with a structure already in place, we have Toronto, Toulouse, London, York, Bradford that could all be worked on. I’m also gonna add Leigh to that, even though their owner has thrown his toys out of the pram. I know Bradford have been shocking off the field in recent years, but I still think SL is a better place with a strong Bradford than without.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 1789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2016 | 8 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| And a club ready and waiting to get the run to SL if they could get the opportunity to, stadium_check, backers_check, potential fanbase_check...
Manchester Rangers!
Already getting 250 fans attending eighth/ninth division games in this stadiumhttps://www.rugby-league.com/_mediaimages/imagesource.php?image
The one in the foreground, on that huge sporting campus, where the RFL are moving to...
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 250 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2018 | 6 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Sep 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Yesterday has debunked the following myths:
1. Expansion into France has failed
2. French players are squad players and not key players for Catalans
3. McNamara is a rubbish coach who won't win anything and doesn't know what he's doing.
4. No one watches Catalans away from home
5. The BBC secretly hate RL and promote union as much as they can.
6. Catalan cant win away from home.
7. The French bottle it in the big games
8. Richard Lewis was wrong to put Catalans into a British SL and protect them with licensing.
9. Attendances matter and is what should be focused on
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 250 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2018 | 6 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Sep 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Psychedelic Casual "And a club ready and waiting to get the run to SL if they could get the opportunity to, stadium_check, backers_check, potential fanbase_check...
Manchester Rangers!
Already getting 250 fans attending eighth/ninth division games in this stadiumhttps://www.rugby-league.com/_mediaimages/imagesource.php?image
The one in the foreground, on that huge sporting campus, where the RFL are moving to...'"
I'd love to see Rangers admitted into L1.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 7194 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2019 | Jul 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Joff "Yesterday has debunked the following myths
Firstly your missing post is on the viva la Catalans thread secondly I don’t think anyone has said expansion has failed in France on the contrary I think we’re ready for another French team in SL and I’ve heard the call for Manchester rangers for a while now but are they ready or even want to be in L1 yet ( what happened to the Oxford/ Gloucester merger) and finally calling everyone who supports a heartlands club an anti expansionist flatcapper doesn’t really help
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Psychedelic Casual "Areas of the country with no top Premier League side or top RU side:
Southport
Grimsby
Lincoln
Stoke
Chester
Sunderland
Plymouth
Shrewsbury
Blackpool
York
Peterborough
Southend-on-sea
Portsmouth
Derby
Preston
Lancaster
Middlesbrough
Bradford
Aldershot and Farnborough
Barnsley
Luton
Milton Keynes
Crawley
Mansfield
Swindon
Peterborough'" )
Many of those places are football towns through and through. I was an advocate of Milton Keynes about 15 years ago but that opportunity has gone, with the MK Dons now established.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| London may not have succeeded too well club wise but has produced quite a few SL players. It has expanded the player pool.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7152 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 272 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2020 | Apr 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Cronus "My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.'"
Absolutely correct
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1345 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Dec 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Cronus "My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.'"
Top post, absolutely correct
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
2.72314453125:10
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M | 1,756 | 80,156 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|