So England got a penalty in the second half then.

Not one of them penalties, more the off the cuff penalties for messing about at the ruck, laying on etc

.

You know which one’s we’re on about, the ones where the bias of the referee comes into play.

The cheating Aussie lover penalties

.

You're missing the point. The on-field referee didn't give England a penalty in the 2nd half.

His brother, however, did give one, the obstruction which was too obvious for even him to ignore.

So yes, while 5-0 overall is incorrect, it's still correct to say the referee awarded 5 penalties to Australia and none to England.

I'm not missing anything. I didn't realise a penalty only counts toward the total count if it is given by the onfield referee.

You have to commend the Aussies on their ability to put almost every single England kicker on his back for a whole game without once being late in the tackle or offside in getting there




JEEZ they're good

Guilty as accepted, but, with some codicils implanted.
I do not find it difficult either to accept if I have made a wrong judgement. Better that than to remain knowing I was in error and yet would not admit to it.

See, entirely missing the point. I can only hope deliberately.

Just watching Tonga verses The ' Cooks' from 364 nights ago to ' cleanse ' myself of the dirty stench of sundays game

Again, I'm not missing anything. People are saying England did not get a penalty in the 2nd half wben they obviously did. One. Why are you getting so agitated about this?

' missing ' no, ignoring, yes

Agitated? Please, there are many posters far better at fishing for a rise, in this thread alone. That was feeble.

I've explained it once and you completely ignored it. That's your right of course but don't expect me to go repeating myself until you respond to the points.

Won't expect too much.

Whats up madrover? ,cat got your tongue?