Hunslet kits look like something a top amateur team would have, they could have had a better kit launch though than them pair.

A lot of teams have done this. Get some ugly, fat, balding prop forward to make the kit look horrible.

Either get it on a strapping young player or get the chicks in. Sums up RL, no commercial ability at all.

That is basic marketing that anyone should know. You are 100% correct that the majority of these clubs have no idea commercially, and wonder why the hell they dont have a pot to in.

IMO Doncaster set the standard when it comes to kit launches, all clubs should follow their lead IMO.

Why something a top amateur team would have? What is the difference between amateur teams' kits and pro teams' kits? They are made by a lot of the same suppliers.

New old school top for the last season at the willows

[urlhttp://reds.originalreddevils.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/heritage600.jpg[/url

Class. Will they be wearing it be a playing kit at any point? Last game at the Willows, perhaps (though it'd obviously look a bit weird if Swinton wear it

)?

Well Swinton is IN Salford



It will be worn for all home games next season.

lets just hope nothing gets in the way of the stadium build now. Otherwise it'll look a little bit silly with the 2011 crossed out to have 2012 instead

Behold! Kooga actually make a decent jersey!

Salford's shirt wins.

It would if it were a playing shirt rather than a limited edition commemorative shirt.

Really? Pah, shows how much attention I pay

. Presumed it was playing because of the SL logo.

As you were...