FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Bulls latest (sorry forgot to change title) |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 17980 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
simpsons/simp006.gif :simpsons/simp006.gif |
|
| Quote: Mild Rover "Absolutely true. And I'm not taking a holier than thou line. If Bradford could reach agreement with 75% of their creditors, then that'd do for me. They and the system could carry on with a meaningless black mark against their name for the next round of licensing.
But not starting from scratch [iwithin the framework of licensing[/i - I know there have been spectacular fudges in the past, but not while simultaneously try to maintain a pretence of regulation and good governance.
As with referees, we can have (or at least aspire to) 'common sense' or 'consistency'. There's a decent common sense argument for another fudge, but then we have to face up to the licence criteria being, like the pirates' code, 'more what you'd call guidelines than actual rules' and them being treated with a similar level of respect.
edit
Most creditors would reluctantly take a % in the £ rather than get nothing (if oldco was going to be liquidated) and tbf, apart from the players, they wont have too many valuable assets.
The franchise system is in tatters with what has come to light over recent months. Even if there is still the semblence of an arguement that the 14 strongest clubs received a license last time around, the whole process has been shown to be not fit for purpose, so what should we have in future ?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12646 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33809_1522680904.png 'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png |
Moderator
|
| Quote: wrencat1873 "so what should we have in future ?'"
Normal P&R wasn't working either tbf and licensing in some ways looked (on paper) a reasonable compromise - not closing the door on ambitious championship clubs, while also offering more stability - in theory. But it's ended up as the worst of both worlds - we don't have a control experiment, but clubs are still falling over too often and those outside SL have neither faith in the system or much hope that they might replace an incumbent. Understandably IMO.
The other options that I can see are:
1. A return to one up one down each year, while narrowing the financial gap between the top flight and the second tier so relegation isn't a life-threatening catastrophe and promotion looks a bit less like a poisoned chalice. The SL2 model that is proposed from time to time would be one version. Unlikely - in the absence of new money (that elusive panacea), it'd be a redistributive solution - pigs'll fly first.
2. A three year P&R cycle. Points accumulated over 3 seasons determine who goes up and down. Fewer complaints about meaningless games, or '1 bad year' ruining a club. Not so many unpleasant choices for the governing body to make - they thought they were taking on powers, when actually all they got were responsibilities. That'd be my preference.
3. An NRL model, openly and honestly admitting that the door to the top flight is closed and clubs should make arrangements accordingly - some/most championship clubs likely to become barely-autonomous reserve grade teams.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 16250 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
953.jpg 2015 - major missed opportunity, 2016 - stronger teams = harder task (no problem there then), 2017 - OMG What now!!!:953.jpg |
|
| One of the reasons PR stopped working was because all but the chosen 12 had funds taken away. What's up with a sliding scale based on performance on the pitch.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12646 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33809_1522680904.png 'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_33809.png |
Moderator
|
| Quote: DemonUK "What's up with a sliding scale based on performance on the pitch.'"
If it's pronounced it tends to lock in success (and by extension failure) in a self-reinforcing cycle.
It's no coincidence, for example, that the EPL developed a big 4 (Liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal for some years, Man City taking Liverpool's place now I guess) and also had 4 richly rewarded spots in the Euro Big Cup.
The Premier League as a sporting competition is cack for about four-fifths of its participants.
Now SL has also had a big 4, I admit, even without the distorting effect of something like the Big Cup. But all the more reason, IMO.
The reward for performance on the pitch is wins and ideally trophies. A bit of prize money for the players aside, any financial benefits should come from increased fan interest.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 36786 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | May 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6505_1460484023.jpg [i:10za56ci]Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm
It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One[/i:10za56ci]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6505.jpg |
Moderator
|
| Quote: DemonUK "One of the reasons PR stopped working was because all but the chosen 12 had funds taken away. What's up with a sliding scale based on performance on the pitch.'"
Which funds were removed?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 8224 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2012 | Sep 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
7741_1339451243.jpg When you're a Bradford fan there's always a light at the end of the tunnel.
Unfortunately it's usually an oncoming train:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_7741.jpg |
|
| Quote: Kosh "Which funds were removed?'"
I'm sure I saw something about them removing the parachute payment to relegated clubs. But I could be wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 36786 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | May 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6505_1460484023.jpg [i:10za56ci]Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm
It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One[/i:10za56ci]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6505.jpg |
Moderator
|
| Quote: Roofaldo "I'm sure I saw something about them removing the parachute payment to relegated clubs. But I could be wrong'"
That was the only thing I could think of. And it was removed after lobbying by the Championship clubs themselves...
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 16250 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
953.jpg 2015 - major missed opportunity, 2016 - stronger teams = harder task (no problem there then), 2017 - OMG What now!!!:953.jpg |
|
| Monies used to be shared out on a sliding scale based on position from top of top league to bottom of bottom league. Now SL clubs get over a million each champ clubs 90k each. Er why is there a big gap doh. Next year champ monies are reduced again. And they say they care about the championships.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 36786 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | May 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6505_1460484023.jpg [i:10za56ci]Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm
It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One[/i:10za56ci]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6505.jpg |
Moderator
|
| Quote: DemonUK "Monies used to be shared out on a sliding scale based on position from top of top league to bottom of bottom league. Now SL clubs get over a million each champ clubs 90k each. Er why is there a big gap doh. Next year champ monies are reduced again. And they say they care about the championships.'"
The SKY money was never, ever, shared on any kind of sliding scale and the Championship clubs never got any of it anyway. Are you saying that the RFL give each SL club £1m of [itheir own money[/i every year?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 16250 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
953.jpg 2015 - major missed opportunity, 2016 - stronger teams = harder task (no problem there then), 2017 - OMG What now!!!:953.jpg |
|
| Before SKy. Never said sky money was. Before lindsay sold or soul and took our game away from the masses.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 358 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2015 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
56291_1297703085.jpg [url=http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/mrcarl84:3dx5x0of]Get a free sim with £5 credit![/url:3dx5x0of]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_56291.jpg |
|
| Quote: DemonUK "Before SKy. Never said sky money was. Before lindsay sold or soul and took our game away from the masses.'"
For better or worse, we've moved our elite competition to Sky Sports. To say that we have took it away from the masses, however, is a little hysterical. People with more than a passing interest in sport nowadays will have a subscription to Sky Sports. If they still choose not to watch RL, then that's down to their indifference, not the act of "selling our soul".
And before people start crying poverty, and saying they can't afford to watch the rugby anymore; if you really can't afford the fifty quid or so a month to watch what you claim is a sport you are passionate about, then watching rugby is probably the least of your problems.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 1523 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2016 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
53317_1346348051.jpg Championship (3 times): 1947–48, 1953–54, 1954–55
Challenge Cup Winners (8 times): 1904–05, 1906–07, 1949–50, 1953–54, 1973–74, 2009, 2010, 2012
Super League Leaders Shield (once): 2011
Premiership Winners (once): 1985–86,
Lancashire League (8 times): 1937–38, 1947–48, 1948–49, 1950–51, 1953–54, 1954–55, 1955–56, 1967–68
Lancashire Cup (9 times): 1921–22, 1929–30, 1932–33, 1937–38, 1959–60, 1965–66, 1980–81, 1982–83, 1989–90
Regal Trophy (4 times): 1973–74, 1977–78, 1980–81, 1990–91
ITV Floodlit Competition: 1955–56:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_53317.jpg |
|
| Quote: Mr Carl "For better or worse, we've moved our elite competition to Sky Sports. To say that we have took it away from the masses, however, is a little hysterical. People with more than a passing interest in sport nowadays will have a subscription to Sky Sports. If they still choose not to watch RL, then that's down to their indifference, not the act of "selling our soul".
And before people start crying poverty, and saying they can't afford to watch the rugby anymore; if you really can't afford the fifty quid or so a month to watch what you claim is a sport you are passionate about, then watching rugby is probably the least of your problems.'"
or go the pub
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 358 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2015 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
56291_1297703085.jpg [url=http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/mrcarl84:3dx5x0of]Get a free sim with £5 credit![/url:3dx5x0of]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_56291.jpg |
|
| Quote: wolfinwidnes "or go the pub'"
Sounds like a plan. Mine's a pint!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 1276 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Kosh "......the Championship clubs never got any of it anyway. .......'"
You are wrong.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 36786 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | May 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6505_1460484023.jpg [i:10za56ci]Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm
It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One[/i:10za56ci]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6505.jpg |
Moderator
|
| Quote: Mr Dog "You are wrong.'"
AFAIK the Championship clubs only received SKY money during one of the seasons when SKY broadcast their games. This was not a share of the SL cash.
|
|
|
|
|
|