It doesnt work for each team to have a round where instead of playing salford they play nobody?

Seems to work elsewhere!

Not in this context it doesn't.

No it doesnt, odd number of teams and odd number of games doesnt work, do the maths

10 minutes Chris, have you sussed the flaw in your cunning plan yet?

It is late to be fair...

No they didn’t.

After the initial loan, which Bradford failed to pay back a penny piece, they then gave them some more cash & took the lease off Bradford’s hands.

The biggest conundrum is why are Bradford receiving less Sky monies for the next two years?

I would hazard a guess that in two years time Bradford will hold the lease once again & the other clubs have received a bonus payment for their complicity.

You’re right, the two situations are very different, Bradford had a tangible asset to bargain with, and Salford have got sod all.

Bradford's then owners were quoted as saying that the RFL had basically taken back the cash they'd been given for the lease, as repayment for the loan they never paid back. I don't have full details but it sounds like one at least of the sums advanced was taken away prior to administration.


Isn't this repayment for the SL monies advanced to pay wages?


I guess we'll see, but I don't think that's what the deduction of Sky monies is for.


We're also at two different parts of the season.

The RFL lent Bradford a substantial amount of cash in the off-season on the quiet. When they realised no repayments were been made they then came out with the legendary statement about saving the “Iconic” stadium from charlatans, by stumping up some more cash and taking over the lease.




Nobody knows the truth, however, the amount being withheld from Bradford equates to the amount it cost the RFL to purchase it – I’ll draw my own conclusions.



Allegedly, the rest of the clubs are in receipt of extra Sky monies, which also equates to the amount being withheld from Bradford, it’s funny how all the clubs went along with the RFL’s grand plan back in the summer, without the prospect of a sweetener.




I appreciate that, however, we are in the middle of a licensing period, the connotations of removing one club from the competition even before that season begins is a logistical nightmare.

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 294vr.html Salford City Pirates?

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 294vr.html Salford City Pirates?

Lol, maybe Holdsworth will return given he is a Perth lad.

I think we might struggle to convince our lads to leave the sunniest city in the world to play in one of the glummiest!

How many times are you going to have to battle with this conundrum? They should pose this as a GCSE question.

Got to say I was surprised that ' Dalton ' didnt check first , Id have expected more from him

Yeah, but he is a Widnes lad to be fair

This has added some amusement to an otherwise mundane evening!

I merely posed a problem which we could very still encounter and some bitter "I don't care about this or that I just spend my life on here" fool took me off on a largely irrelevant points tangeant and got me worked up.

You can all score your petty victory if you want, fact remains that if Salford can't start the season we will have this problem. It's hardly my fault the RFL introduced this ludicrously unfair system of one extra game for points which is largely dependent on the opponents you get. I forgot they had been so stupid. Whoopee.

Potential problem: Salford don't start the season.

Meaning: We need a bye round. We will also have an odd team (mine) at Magic Weekend with no fixture and a disadvantage.

I offered a potential solution. Any others? No?