It's not - and anyone who cares to read my comments will see that it's something you've simply [imade up[/i.

Please quote exactly where I said there was no gloating.

dally messenger wrote: and judging from the gloating on here, i think my point stands.


you - No, it doesn't.

This is you making things up again, and hoping people won't notice. It's a strange tactic, particularly as people can simply read the thread.

your reacting to one post, me the other one.

but hey you stick to the liar claim, its making you look good.

This doesn't make sense, and it certainly doesn't quote where I said there was no gloating.

You're not quoting me saying that because I did not say it - you made it up.

how can i have made something up which a person has admitted to doing.

Because I didn't say there was no gloating, so whether someone admits to doing so is irrelevant to your claims regarding what I said.

All you have to do is quote my post where I said there was no gloating.

just repeating myself mate.

just go with liar liar pants on fire, it saves time

Yes, because you can't quote where I said what you claim I've said. You can't do it because you [imade it up[/i.

You never cease to amaze with your alternate reality (population: 1).

Seems to be a recurring theme this, that when people try and converse with Dally, we all end up wondering what we are discussing because rather than answer a question and show himself up that hes wrong, he will just dodge it and come back with something totally irrelevant and add a laughing smily to it.

That's because everyone else but him is a Rugby Union fan.

Use they correct terminology - we're all [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Hopkinsunion trolls!!11!!!one!!!1[/url