I assume Jammer had a gum shield in. If so it would be hard to bite properly.

I think that it can't be decided from the TV footage whether Graham did ora did not bite Slater.

On one side
[* Graham has his head at the side of Slater[/*
[* Slater has a wound to the ear.[/*
[* Slater tells the officials that he was bitten.[/*[/list

However, on the other side
[* Graham would have been wearing a gumshield.[/*
[* The wound, pictured on page 4 of this thread, looks nothing like a bitemark and only the middle of the ear is affected, not the outside. Graham would need to be half-vampire to leave that sort of mark.[/*
[* Graham was seen a couple of weeks ago near the ear of King, but he was just riling King up (to great effect).[/*[/list

Look this this image that appeared on another forum (I didn't make it)[/

Arrow 1. The referee is right next to this but did not report any sort of bite.
Arrow 3. Melbourne's #4 is pushing Graham's head into Slater.



So, overall, it's difficult to say. Whilst it looks suspicious, there is a lot of evidence to suggest otherwise. I'll leave it to the NRL judiciary to make the decision before I consider slagging him off.
If he is guilty then he deserves all this derision and a lengthy ban.
If he is found innocent then I expect that all of you will be queueing up to apologise.

Looked like he bit him to me.

Why does every body think they're ing Quincy?

People defending the indefensible again.

The title of this thread "Jammer lets himself down" is a small part of what he has done.

He has let his team down, the Storm moved up a gear after this incident just as the Dogs were looking like getting back off the deck.

He has let all of his new Aussie followers in the NRL down (Some Dogs fans are calling for his sacking) Graham had a massive following of Aussie admirers for his first season efforts and they all just walked out of the door.

He has let the game down in general, Alleged Biters and Eye gougers do not sell well to Parents deciding which code to send their kids into.

Running in last man, blind siding a player 30kgs smaller is enough without biting him.

It will be 10-12 weeks for this.

If Graham has bitten him, Slater will turn ginger.

We'll see what the enquiry comes up with.
Its not like he took his ear off, so its not the end of the world.
If he's guilty, give him a ban ( i think it was traditionally 8 weeks/matches) and move on.

I too liked the way the Commentators didn't dwell on it. They got on talking about the game and the positives associated.
Stevo and Eddie would still be talking about it now.

If it's all the same to you I'll let Shaun Wane decide on the appropriate punishment.

I hope, for his sake, his defence is a little more sophisticated then that.

The commentators let it roll to an extent because it was a Grand Final and they do not want issues like this to detract from the spectacle and occasion (it does not sell well)

The Media have covered it massively, biting is biting, it matters little that you did not tear his windpipe out.

It's obvious Graham bit him. If he was wearing the gumshield, it's irrelevant as from the angle shown, the bottom teeth would of done the damage.
No place whatsover for this to go on, the games tough enough without stupid acts like this.

he's getting hammered on aussie radio.......he's undone all the excellent work he's done this season the dope..


he'll defo get 10week +

CSI: St Helens

If Graham was pictured with a fully formed ear dripping out of his mouth there would be some on here saying Slater cut it off himself to get their guy sent off.

CSI: St Helens

Thats a department that is a waste of cash. Everyone has the same DNA